PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant in combination with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents for treatment resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD).

METHODS

This study was designed as a single-center, retrospective interventional case series. Consecutive patients with treatment-resistant nvAMD underwent simultaneous combined injection of anti-VEGF agent and dexamethasone intravitreal implant. Eighteen patients with mean age of 81.5 years were included. Patients received average of 26.3 anti-VEGF injections before dual therapy, with mean follow up of 8.2 months after dual therapy.

RESULTS

Dual therapy produced a significant mean decrease in CFT (126.3 μm), compared to a mean increase of 29.9 μm when treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy (p=0.0017). Patients also had mean decrease in MCV of -0.85 mm with dual therapy compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy (p=0.0014). There was a moderate correlation between the number of prior anti-VEGF injections and the magnitude of anatomic response, suggesting that shorter disease duration may positively influence response to combined treatment. Although there was a slight trend towards improved mean visual acuity after dual therapy, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Nevertheless, with combination treatment, 33% of patients gained one or more lines of vision. Dual therapy resulted in a significantly lower number of required anti-VEGF injections (4.25 vs 5.33) and an increase of the anti-VEGF injection-free interval to 1.41 months from 1.12 months during the 6 months following dual therapy compared to the same interval before dual therapy. Dual therapy was well tolerated; two eyes developed mild IOP elevation effectively managed with topical therapy and one patient developed worsening cataract.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined treatment of anti-VEGF with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant is a viable alternative for treatment-resistant nvAMD, and may reduce treatment burden. Earlier treatment with dual therapy may be beneficial to maximize anatomic and visual outcomes in these patients.