Chow Tam-Lin, Kwan Wilson W Y, Fung Siu-Chung, Ho Lai-In
Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Sep-Oct;38(5):529-532. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 20.
Lymph node density(LND) has been shown to be a better prognosticator than conventional nodal classification to predict prognosis for squamous cell carcinoma(SCC) of the oral cavity. However, studies focusing on subsites of oral cancer are meager. The role of LND for buccal SCC was evaluated in this study.
A total of 39 patients with buccal SCC primarily treated surgically with neck dissection were identified. LND was defined as the number of positive nodes over the number of nodal yield. The cut-off of LND was ≤0.07 or >0.07. Patient demographic data and clincopathologic parameters were described. Survival was expressed by Kaplan-Meier method and correlation with survival is analyzed with log-rank test. IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 was used for data computation.
The median follow-up was 79.0months and median nodes removed was 23 (range 8-93). Positive nodal involvement was found in 19(48.7%) patients. The 5-year and 10-year OS were 67.4% and 42.5% whilst for DSS were 69.2% and 65.5%, respectively. When pT-, pN-, LND-classification and AJCC stage were analyzed for the whole series, only pN- (p=0.006) and LND-classification (p=0.002) were significant factors for OS, while pT-, pN-, LND-classification and AJCC stage were all significant factors for DSS. When only cases with positive nodal spread were considered, the pN-classification (pN1 vs pN2) was not a significant risk factor for either OS (p=0.075, HR 3.10(CI 0.89-10.76)) and DSS (p=0.074, HR 3.58(CI 0.88-14.56)). By contrast, LND-classification (≤0.07 vs >0.07) remained a significant predictor for OS (p=0.03, HR 3.95(CI 1.15-13.63)), but not for the DSS (p=0.112, HR 2.92(CI 0.78-10.99)).
The prognostic value of LND on buccal SCC is supported in this study. The results also suggest that LND is better than the conventional pN-classification to predict OS. Further studies on LND with big sample size for buccal SCC or other subsites of OSCC are worthwhile.
淋巴结密度(LND)已被证明是比传统淋巴结分类更好的预后指标,可用于预测口腔鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的预后。然而,针对口腔癌亚部位的研究较少。本研究评估了LND对颊黏膜SCC的作用。
共纳入39例主要接受手术加颈部清扫治疗的颊黏膜SCC患者。LND定义为阳性淋巴结数与清扫淋巴结总数之比。LND的临界值为≤0.07或>0.07。描述了患者的人口统计学数据和临床病理参数。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率,并通过对数秩检验分析其与生存的相关性。数据计算使用IBM SPSS Statistics 22版。
中位随访时间为79.0个月,中位清扫淋巴结数为23个(范围8 - 93个)。19例(48.7%)患者出现阳性淋巴结转移。5年和10年总生存率(OS)分别为67.4%和42.5%,疾病特异性生存率(DSS)分别为69.2%和65.5%。对整个队列分析pT、pN、LND分类和美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期时,仅pN(p = 0.006)和LND分类(p = 0.002)是OS的显著影响因素,而pT、pN、LND分类和AJCC分期均是DSS的显著影响因素。仅考虑有阳性淋巴结转移的病例时,pN分类(pN1 vs pN2)对OS(p = 0.075,风险比[HR] 3.10[可信区间(CI)0.89 - 10.76])和DSS(p = 0.074,HR 3.58[CI 0.88 - 14.56])均不是显著危险因素。相比之下,LND分类(≤0.07 vs >0.07)仍是OS的显著预测因素(p = 0.03,HR 3.95[CI 1.15 - 13.63]),但不是DSS的显著预测因素(p = 0.112,HR 2.92[CI 0.78 - 10.99])。
本研究支持LND对颊黏膜SCC的预后价值。结果还表明,LND在预测OS方面优于传统的pN分类。对颊黏膜SCC或口腔鳞状细胞癌其他亚部位进行大样本量的LND进一步研究是值得的。