Petersen Marie Warrer, Perner Anders, Sjövall Fredrik, Møller Morten Hylander
Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Perioperative Medicine, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e015900. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015900.
Intra-abdominal infections are the second most frequent cause of sepsis. In a recent cohort, fungal specimens were found in 51.9% of all patients with sepsis and peritonitis. Current systematic reviews comparing untargeted antifungal treatment with placebo or no treatment in patients who are critically ill have provided conflicting results, and clinical equipoise exists. Accordingly, we aim to assess patient-important benefits and harms of untargeted antifungal therapy versus placebo or no treatment in adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection.
We will conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials assessing any untargeted antifungal therapy compared with placebo or no treatment in adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes include adverse events, duration of mechanical ventilation and inotropic support, need for renal replacement therapy, emergence of antibiotic resistance and intensive care unit and hospital length-of-stay. Conventional meta-analysis, including sensitivity and subgroup analyses, and assessment of the risk of systematic (bias) and random errors will be conducted. The review will be prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, the Cochrane methodology and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
Ethical approval is not required as this systematic review only includes previously published data. We aim to publish the review in an international peer-reviewed journal.
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number: CRD42016053508.
腹腔内感染是脓毒症的第二大常见病因。在最近的一个队列研究中,51.9%的脓毒症和腹膜炎患者的真菌标本检测呈阳性。目前比较在危重症患者中进行无针对性抗真菌治疗与安慰剂或不治疗的系统评价结果相互矛盾,临床 equipoise 存在。因此,我们旨在评估无针对性抗真菌治疗与安慰剂或不治疗相比,对成年复杂性腹腔内感染患者的重要益处和危害。
我们将对评估在成年复杂性腹腔内感染患者中进行任何无针对性抗真菌治疗与安慰剂或不治疗的随机临床试验进行系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。主要结局是全因死亡率,次要结局包括不良事件、机械通气和血管活性药物支持的持续时间、肾脏替代治疗的需求、抗生素耐药性的出现以及重症监护病房住院时间和医院住院时间。将进行传统的荟萃分析,包括敏感性和亚组分析,以及对系统(偏倚)和随机误差风险的评估。该评价将根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目声明、Cochrane 方法以及推荐分级、评估、制定和评价进行编制。
由于本系统评价仅包括先前发表的数据,因此无需伦理批准。我们旨在将该评价发表在国际同行评审期刊上。
国际前瞻性系统评价注册编号:CRD42016053508。