Suppr超能文献

在破碎化景观中,土壤微生物滤液的宿主特异性效应超过丛枝菌根真菌的效应。

Host-specific effects of soil microbial filtrates prevail over those of arbuscular mycorrhizae in a fragmented landscape.

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA.

Biología de la Conservación, Cenicafé, Km 4 vía Antigua, Chinchiná-Manizales, Colombia.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2017 Sep;27(6):1946-1957. doi: 10.1002/eap.1579. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

Abstract

Plant-soil interactions have been shown to determine plant community composition in a wide range of environments. However, how plants distinctly interact with beneficial and detrimental organisms across mosaic landscapes containing fragmented habitats is still poorly understood. We experimentally tested feedback responses between plants and soil microbial communities from adjacent habitats across a disturbance gradient within a human-modified tropical montane landscape. In a greenhouse experiment, two components of soil microbial communities were amplified; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and a filtrate excluding AMF spores from the soils of pastures (high disturbance), coffee plantations (intermediate disturbance), and forest fragments (low disturbance), using potted seedlings of 11 plant species common in these habitats (pasture grass, coffee, and nine native species). We then examined their effects on growth of these same 11 host species with reciprocal habitat inoculation. Most plant species received a similar benefit from AMF, but differed in their response to the filtrates from the three habitats. Soil filtrate from pastures had a net negative effect on plant growth, while filtrates from coffee plantations and forests had a net positive effect on plant growth. Pasture grass, coffee, and five pioneer tree species performed better with the filtrate from "away" (where these species rarely occur) compared to "home" (where these species typically occur) habitat soils, while four shade-tolerant tree species grew similarly with filtrates from different habitats. These results suggest that pastures accumulate species-specific soil enemies, while coffee plantations and forests accumulate beneficial soil microbes that benefit pioneer native plants and coffee, respectively. Thus, compared to AMF, soil filtrates exerted stronger habitat and host-specific effects on plants, being more important mediators of plant-soil feedbacks across contrasting habitats.

摘要

植物-土壤相互作用已被证明在广泛的环境中决定植物群落的组成。然而,在包含破碎生境的镶嵌景观中,植物如何与有益和有害生物明显相互作用,仍然知之甚少。我们在人为改造的热带山地景观中,沿着干扰梯度,在相邻生境之间,通过实验测试了植物与土壤微生物群落之间的反馈响应。在温室实验中,使用来自牧场(高干扰)、咖啡种植园(中等干扰)和森林片段(低干扰)土壤中的丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)和过滤掉 AMF 孢子的滤液,对 11 种常见于这些生境的植物物种的盆栽幼苗进行了两种土壤微生物群落成分的扩增。然后,我们通过互惠生境接种,检查了这些相同的 11 种宿主物种对它们的生长的影响。大多数植物物种从 AMF 中获得相似的益处,但对来自三个生境的滤液的反应不同。牧场土壤滤液对植物生长有净负面影响,而咖啡种植园和森林土壤滤液对植物生长有净正面影响。与“本地”(这些物种通常存在的地方)土壤相比,牧场草、咖啡和 5 种先锋树种在“外地”(这些物种很少出现的地方)的滤液中表现更好,而 4 种耐荫树种在不同生境的滤液中生长相似。这些结果表明,牧场积累了特定物种的土壤天敌,而咖啡种植园和森林则积累了有利于先锋本土植物和咖啡的有益土壤微生物。因此,与 AMF 相比,土壤滤液对植物表现出更强的生境和宿主特异性影响,是不同生境中植物-土壤反馈的更重要的介导者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验