Cain Michael L, Andreasen Viggo, Howard Daniel J
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003.
Department of Mathematics and Physics, Roskilde University, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Evolution. 1999 Oct;53(5):1343-1353. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05399.x.
Many hybrid zones have a mosaic structure, yet we know of no theoretical work that examines the impact of mosaicism on the outcome of evolution. We developed a computer simulation model designed to test whether the outcome of reinforcing selection differs in a mosaic and a clinal hybrid zone. Our model was a one-dimensional stepping-stone model. The mosaic and clinal hybrid zones that we modeled were, respectively, a mosaic maintained by differential fitness of the interacting taxa in patchy habitats and a tension zone. We modeled changes in gene frequency at two biallelic loci, A and B. Hybrids at the A locus were selected against. An allele at the B locus caused assortative mating at the A locus, which promoted reinforcement; there was a selective cost to this allele. In a mosaic hybrid zone, spatial variation in the fitness of A-locus homozygotes in different patches caused gene and genotype frequencies at the A and B loci to differ greatly from those in a tension zone. Compared to a tension zone, a mosaic hybrid zone had a broader region in which hybrids could be formed and, thus, a broader region in which the assortative-mating allele provided a net selective advantage (via decreased production of the less fit A-locus hybrids). This caused the assortative-mating allele to be favored under a broader set of conditions in a mosaic hybrid zone than in a tension zone. In mosaic and tension hybrid zones, both low and high levels of migration could prevent the establishment of the allele that promoted reinforcement, but the allele could establish under a wider range of migration rates in a mosaic than in a tension zone. In a tension zone, both low and high levels of selection against A-locus hybrids could prevent the establishment of the assortative-mating allele. In a mosaic hybrid zone, the assortative-mating allele established under lower levels of selection against hybrids than in a tension zone, and high levels of selection did not impede the establishment of this allele. Overall, our work illustrates how the structure of a hybrid zone can alter the outcome of an important evolutionary process, in this case, reinforcement.
许多杂交带具有镶嵌结构,但我们尚未发现有理论研究探讨镶嵌性对进化结果的影响。我们开发了一个计算机模拟模型,旨在测试强化选择在镶嵌杂交带和渐变杂交带中的结果是否不同。我们的模型是一维的 stepping - stone 模型。我们模拟的镶嵌杂交带和渐变杂交带分别是由斑块状栖息地中相互作用的分类群的适应性差异维持的镶嵌体和一个张力带。我们模拟了两个双等位基因位点 A 和 B 的基因频率变化。A 位点的杂合子受到选择淘汰。B 位点的一个等位基因导致在 A 位点的选型交配,从而促进了生殖隔离;该等位基因存在选择成本。在镶嵌杂交带中,不同斑块中 A 位点纯合子适应性的空间变化导致 A 和 B 位点的基因和基因型频率与张力带中的情况有很大差异。与张力带相比,镶嵌杂交带中有更广泛的区域可以形成杂种,因此,有更广泛的区域中选型交配等位基因能提供净选择优势(通过减少不适应的 A 位点杂种的产生)。这使得选型交配等位基因在镶嵌杂交带中比在张力带中在更广泛的条件下受到青睐。在镶嵌杂交带和张力杂交带中,低水平和高水平的迁移都可能阻止促进生殖隔离的等位基因的建立,但在镶嵌杂交带中,该等位基因能在比张力杂交带更广泛的迁移率范围内建立。在张力带中,对 A 位点杂种的低水平和高水平选择都可能阻止选型交配等位基因的建立。在镶嵌杂交带中,与张力带相比,在对杂种较低水平的选择下选型交配等位基因就能建立,而高水平的选择并不会阻碍该等位基因的建立。总体而言,我们的研究表明杂交带的结构如何改变一个重要进化过程(在这种情况下是生殖隔离)的结果。