Schluter Dolph
Department of Zoology and Centre for Biodiversity Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Evolution. 1996 Oct;50(5):1766-1774. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03563.x.
Are measurements of quantitative genetic variation useful for predicting long-term adaptive evolution? To answer this question, I focus on g , the multivariate direction of greatest additive genetic variance within populations. Original data on threespine sticklebacks, together with published genetic measurements from other vertebrates, show that morphological differentiation between species has been biased in the direction of g for at least four million years, despite evidence that natural selection is the cause of differentiation. This bias toward the direction of evolution tends to decay with time. Rate of morphological divergence between species is inversely proportional to θ, the angle between the direction of divergence and the direction of greatest genetic variation. The direction of greatest phenotypic variance is not identical with g , but for these data is nearly as successful at predicting the direction of species divergence. I interpret the findings to mean that genetic variances and covariances constrain adaptive change in quantitative traits for reasonably long spans of time. An alternative hypothesis, however, cannot be ruled out: that morphological differentiation is biased in the direction g because divergence and g are both shaped by the same natural selection pressures. Either way, the results reveal that adaptive differentiation occurs principally along "genetic lines of least resistance."
对数量遗传变异的测量对于预测长期适应性进化有用吗?为了回答这个问题,我聚焦于g,即种群内最大加性遗传方差的多变量方向。三刺鱼的原始数据,以及其他脊椎动物已发表的遗传测量数据表明,尽管有证据表明自然选择是物种分化的原因,但至少在四百万年的时间里,物种间的形态分化一直偏向于g的方向。这种朝着进化方向的偏向往往会随着时间而衰减。物种间形态差异的速率与θ成反比,θ是差异方向与最大遗传变异方向之间的夹角。最大表型方差的方向与g并不相同,但对于这些数据而言,在预测物种分化方向方面几乎同样成功。我将这些发现解释为意味着遗传方差和协方差在相当长的时间跨度内限制了数量性状的适应性变化。然而,另一种假设也不能排除:形态分化偏向于g的方向是因为分化和g都受到相同自然选择压力的影响。无论哪种方式,结果都表明适应性分化主要沿着“遗传阻力最小的路线”发生。