• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蚊虫核型进化中的染色体重排与连锁群保守性

CHROMOSOMAL REPATTERNING AND LINKAGE GROUP CONSERVATION IN MOSQUITO KARYOTYPIC EVOLUTION.

作者信息

Matthews T C, Munstermann L E

机构信息

Department of Biology, Millikin University, Decatur, Illinois, 62522.

Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, 60 College Street, 606 LEPH, New Haven, Connecticut, 06510.

出版信息

Evolution. 1994 Feb;48(1):146-154. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01301.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01301.x
PMID:28567783
Abstract

Chromosome number and morphology in mosquitoes is remarkably uniform: virtually all mosquitoes have a diploid chromosome number of six (2N = 6), and their chromosomes are invariably metacentric or submetacentric. Numerical changes obviously have not been important in mosquito chromosomal evolution, and because of the morphological similarity of their chromosomes, it appears that structural changes have played little or no role in mosquito karyotypic evolution. The goal of the present study was to identify the types and relative numbers of chromosomal changes in mosquito evolution and to extend the comparison where possible to the higher diptera. To do this, we compared the enzyme linkage maps of six species of Aedes to each other and to enzyme maps of seven other mosquito species and to Drosophila melanogaster. Our results indicate that Aedes chromosomes have been modified by inversions, most which were paracentric, and by translocations, most which were Robertsonian. Intrageneric comparison of Aedes enzyme maps also revealed groups of linked enzyme loci whose integrity has been maintained throughout Aedes evolution (conserved linkages/syntenies). Intergeneric comparisons of Aedes enzyme maps with those of species in the genera Culex, Anopheles, and Toxorhynchites disclosed conserved associations of enzyme loci between mosquito genera. These findings lead us to postulate that the ancestral mosquito karyotype consisted of six chromosomal elements which, other than being combined in different ways in various mosquito groups, have remained essentially intact during mosquito evolution. Furthermore, the identification of groups of linked enzyme loci common to mosquitoes and to D. melanogaster indicates that linkage group conservation may characterize the karyotypic evolution of all dipteran insects.

摘要

蚊子的染色体数目和形态非常一致

几乎所有蚊子的二倍体染色体数目都是6条(2N = 6),而且它们的染色体总是中着丝粒或亚中着丝粒染色体。数目变化显然在蚊子的染色体进化中并不重要,并且由于它们染色体的形态相似性,似乎结构变化在蚊子核型进化中几乎没有发挥作用或根本没有发挥作用。本研究的目的是确定蚊子进化中染色体变化的类型和相对数量,并尽可能将比较扩展到更高级的双翅目昆虫。为此,我们将六种伊蚊的酶连锁图谱相互比较,并与其他七种蚊子的酶图谱以及黑腹果蝇的酶图谱进行比较。我们的结果表明,伊蚊的染色体已经通过倒位(大多数是臂内倒位)和易位(大多数是罗伯逊易位)发生了改变。伊蚊酶图谱的属内比较还揭示了一些连锁酶基因座组,其完整性在整个伊蚊进化过程中得以维持(保守连锁/同线基因)。伊蚊酶图谱与库蚊属、按蚊属和巨蚊属物种的酶图谱的属间比较揭示了蚊子属之间酶基因座的保守关联。这些发现使我们推测,原始蚊子核型由六个染色体元件组成,这些元件除了在不同蚊子群体中以不同方式组合外,在蚊子进化过程中基本保持完整。此外,对蚊子和黑腹果蝇共有的连锁酶基因座组的鉴定表明,连锁群保守性可能是所有双翅目昆虫核型进化的特征。

相似文献

1
CHROMOSOMAL REPATTERNING AND LINKAGE GROUP CONSERVATION IN MOSQUITO KARYOTYPIC EVOLUTION.蚊虫核型进化中的染色体重排与连锁群保守性
Evolution. 1994 Feb;48(1):146-154. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01301.x.
2
Genetic maps of the sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina: linkage-group correlations with other dipteran genera.绵羊绿蝇(Lucilia cuprina)的遗传图谱:与其他双翅目属的连锁群相关性
Genome. 1993 Jun;36(3):495-506. doi: 10.1139/g93-068.
3
MOSQUITO CYTOGENETICS. A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE, 1953-62.蚊虫细胞遗传学。文献综述,1953 - 1962年
Bull World Health Organ. 1963;29(3):345-55.
4
Complete Dosage Compensation in Anopheles stephensi and the Evolution of Sex-Biased Genes in Mosquitoes.斯氏按蚊中的完全剂量补偿与蚊子性别偏向基因的进化
Genome Biol Evol. 2015 Jun 15;7(7):1914-24. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv115.
5
Horizontal transmission of an R4 clade non-long terminal repeat retrotransposon between the divergent Aedes and Anopheles mosquito genera.R4分支非长末端重复逆转座子在不同的伊蚊属和按蚊属蚊子之间的水平传播。
Insect Mol Biol. 2015 Jun;24(3):331-7. doi: 10.1111/imb.12160. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
6
Serosal cuticle formation and distinct degrees of desiccation resistance in embryos of the mosquito vectors Aedes aegypti, Anopheles aquasalis and Culex quinquefasciatus.表皮角质层形成与埃及伊蚊、致倦库蚊和三带喙库蚊胚胎的不同程度抗干燥能力。
J Insect Physiol. 2014 Mar;62:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
7
A generic weather-driven model to predict mosquito population dynamics applied to species of Anopheles, Culex and Aedes genera of southern France.一种通用的受天气驱动的模型,用于预测法国南部按蚊、库蚊和伊蚊属物种的蚊虫种群动态。
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Jun 1;120(1):39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.12.018. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
8
Karyotype relationships of six bat species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) from China revealed by chromosome painting and G-banding comparison.通过染色体涂染和G带比较揭示的中国六种蝙蝠(翼手目,蝙蝠科)的核型关系
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;115(2):145-53. doi: 10.1159/000095235.
9
Trends of karyotypic evolution in the genus Hipposideros (Chiroptera: Mammalia).蹄蝠属(翼手目:哺乳纲)的核型进化趋势
Cytobios. 1993;75(300):49-57.
10
Differential occurrence of chromosome inversion polymorphisms among Muller's elements in three species of the tripunctata group of Drosophila, including a species with fast chromosomal evolution.在果蝇的 tripunctata 组的三个物种中,Muller 元件的染色体倒位多态性的差异发生,包括一个具有快速染色体进化的物种。
Genome. 2013 Jan;56(1):17-26. doi: 10.1139/gen-2012-0074. Epub 2013 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative genomic analysis of two distant diptera, the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, and the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.对两种远缘双翅目昆虫——果蝇(黑腹果蝇)和疟疾蚊子(冈比亚按蚊)的比较基因组分析。
Genome Res. 2002 Jan;12(1):57-66. doi: 10.1101/gr.196101.
2
How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.真核生物基因组的可塑性如何?果蝇属中染色体重排的极高速率。
Genome Res. 2001 Feb;11(2):230-9. doi: 10.1101/gr.162901.
3
Genetics of mosquito vector competence.蚊媒传播能力的遗传学
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000 Mar;64(1):115-37. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.64.1.115-137.2000.