Suppr超能文献

管道里有什么?北约在1962年大口径管道禁运问题上的对抗。

What's in a Pipe?: NATO's Confrontation on the 1962 Large-Diameter Pipe Embargo.

作者信息

Cantoni Roberto

出版信息

Technol Cult. 2017;58(1):67-96. doi: 10.1353/tech.2017.0002.

Abstract

By the late 1950s, the Soviet Union had acquired a strong position as a world oil exporter, thanks to major discoveries in the Ural-Volga area. In order to transport their oil to strategic areas within the Union and to Europe, the Soviets devised a project to build a colossal pipeline system. This plan caused anxiety at NATO since Russian oil could be wielded as a weapon to weaken the West both militarily and economically. In order to complete the system, however, the Soviets needed large-diameter steel pipes and equipment, which they had to import from the West. Thus in 1961 the U.S. delegation at NATO proposed a comprehensive embargo of large-diameter pipes in order to delay the system's construction. I argue that the definition of what oil pipes were as technological artifacts, as well as their final content, was ultimately shaped by the NATO debate on this U.S. proposition.

摘要

到20世纪50年代末,由于在乌拉尔-伏尔加地区的重大发现,苏联已成为世界石油出口大国。为了将石油输送到苏联境内的战略地区以及欧洲,苏联人设计了一个建造庞大管道系统的项目。这一计划在北约引发了焦虑,因为俄罗斯的石油可能被用作武器,在军事和经济上削弱西方。然而,为了完成该系统,苏联人需要大口径钢管和设备,而这些他们不得不从西方进口。于是在1961年,北约的美国代表团提议全面禁运大口径管道,以延缓该系统的建设。我认为,作为技术制品的石油管道的定义以及它们的最终内容,最终是由北约关于美国这一提议的辩论所塑造的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验