Cantoni Roberto
Technol Cult. 2017;58(1):67-96. doi: 10.1353/tech.2017.0002.
By the late 1950s, the Soviet Union had acquired a strong position as a world oil exporter, thanks to major discoveries in the Ural-Volga area. In order to transport their oil to strategic areas within the Union and to Europe, the Soviets devised a project to build a colossal pipeline system. This plan caused anxiety at NATO since Russian oil could be wielded as a weapon to weaken the West both militarily and economically. In order to complete the system, however, the Soviets needed large-diameter steel pipes and equipment, which they had to import from the West. Thus in 1961 the U.S. delegation at NATO proposed a comprehensive embargo of large-diameter pipes in order to delay the system's construction. I argue that the definition of what oil pipes were as technological artifacts, as well as their final content, was ultimately shaped by the NATO debate on this U.S. proposition.
到20世纪50年代末,由于在乌拉尔-伏尔加地区的重大发现,苏联已成为世界石油出口大国。为了将石油输送到苏联境内的战略地区以及欧洲,苏联人设计了一个建造庞大管道系统的项目。这一计划在北约引发了焦虑,因为俄罗斯的石油可能被用作武器,在军事和经济上削弱西方。然而,为了完成该系统,苏联人需要大口径钢管和设备,而这些他们不得不从西方进口。于是在1961年,北约的美国代表团提议全面禁运大口径管道,以延缓该系统的建设。我认为,作为技术制品的石油管道的定义以及它们的最终内容,最终是由北约关于美国这一提议的辩论所塑造的。