同行评审流程及对同行评审者的理想态度。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers.

作者信息

Chung Kyu Jin

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Arch Plast Surg. 2017 May;44(3):177-178. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.177. Epub 2017 May 22.

DOI:10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.177

PMID:28573090

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5447525/

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers.

Arch Plast Surg. 2017 May;44(3):177-178. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.177. Epub 2017 May 22.

Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".

Dan Med J. 2012 Aug;59(8):A4479.

Attitudes toward blinding of peer review and perceptions of efficacy within a small biomedical specialty.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Aug 1;89(5):940-946. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?

Educ Prim Care. 2009 Jan;20(1):34-40. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2009.11493759.

Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.

Ethiop Med J. 2013 Apr;51(2):95-103.

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study.

BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 2;5(7):e008380. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008380.

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers.

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 13;12(12):e0189311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189311. eCollection 2017.

Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.

Spine Deform. 2016 Jul;4(4):268-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science.

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179031. eCollection 2017.

Context-Aware Reviewer Assignment for Trust Enhanced Peer Review.

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0130493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130493. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

Peer review and roles of the reviewer.

Arch Craniofac Surg. 2019 Dec;20(6):345-346. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2019.00787. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

Tips on writing and reviewing articles as a non-english speaking medical doctor.

Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Jan;42(1):1-3. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.1.1. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):848-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0782.

Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jun;184(6):1731-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841731.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers.

Arch Plast Surg. 2017 May;44(3):177-178. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.177. Epub 2017 May 22.

Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".

Dan Med J. 2012 Aug;59(8):A4479.

Attitudes toward blinding of peer review and perceptions of efficacy within a small biomedical specialty.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Aug 1;89(5):940-946. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?

Educ Prim Care. 2009 Jan;20(1):34-40. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2009.11493759.

Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.

Ethiop Med J. 2013 Apr;51(2):95-103.

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study.

BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 2;5(7):e008380. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008380.

Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers.

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 13;12(12):e0189311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189311. eCollection 2017.

Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.

Spine Deform. 2016 Jul;4(4):268-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science.

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179031. eCollection 2017.

Context-Aware Reviewer Assignment for Trust Enhanced Peer Review.

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0130493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130493. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

Peer review and roles of the reviewer.

Arch Craniofac Surg. 2019 Dec;20(6):345-346. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2019.00787. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

Tips on writing and reviewing articles as a non-english speaking medical doctor.

Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Jan;42(1):1-3. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.1.1. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):848-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0782.

Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jun;184(6):1731-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841731.