Piazza Cesare, Bon Francesca Del, Paderno Alberto, Grammatica Alberto, Montalto Nausica, Taglietti Valentina, Nicolai Piero
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Laryngoscope. 2017 Dec;127(12):2731-2737. doi: 10.1002/lary.26705. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Different reconstructive options are available for defects following total laryngectomy (TL) and circumferential (CH) or partial hypopharyngectomy (PH). We evaluated the flap success, pharyngocutaneous fistula, and pharyngoesophageal stenosis rates in two groups of patients treated by different policies.
Comparison between two cohorts of patients treated by TL with PH/CH ± cervical esophagectomy and reconstructed according to different strategies.
Group A (historical) was composed of 89 patients reconstructed by pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC), radial forearm (RF), and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps. A salivary bypass stent (SBPS) was not routinely applied and left in place for a maximum of 14 days. Forty-four (49%) patients received preoperative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT). Group B (prospective) included 105 patients reconstructed by RF or ALT with long-lasting SBPS left in place for a maximum of 45 days. Sixty-one (59%) received preoperative RT/CRT.
In group A, flap failure occurred in four (4%) cases, and all were managed by PMMC. We encountered 22 (26%) fistulas and 14 (16%) stenoses. In group B, flap failure occurred in six (6%) cases and was managed by PMMC. We encountered seven (7%) fistulas and three (3%) stenoses. Comparing complications among the two groups, we encountered a statistically significant difference in favor of group B for both fistula (P < .001) and stenosis (P = .001). We did not evidence any significant difference in terms of flap success rate.
First-line application of RF and ALT free flaps with long-lasting SBPS in reconstruction after PH/CH allows obtaining reduced incidences of both fistula and stenosis.
目的/假设:全喉切除术(TL)以及环状(CH)或部分下咽切除术(PH)后缺损有不同的重建方案可供选择。我们评估了两组采用不同策略治疗的患者的皮瓣成功率、咽皮肤瘘及咽食管狭窄发生率。
对两组接受TL联合PH/CH±颈段食管切除术并采用不同策略进行重建的患者进行比较。
A组(历史队列)由89例采用胸大肌肌皮瓣(PMMC)、桡侧前臂皮瓣(RF)和股前外侧皮瓣(ALT)重建的患者组成。未常规应用唾液转流支架(SBPS),其留置时间最长为14天。44例(49%)患者接受了术前放疗/同步放化疗(RT/CRT)。B组(前瞻性队列)包括105例采用RF或ALT重建且长期留置SBPS最长达45天的患者。61例(59%)接受了术前RT/CRT。
A组有4例(4%)出现皮瓣失败,均采用PMMC处理。出现22例(26%)瘘和14例(16%)狭窄。B组有6例(6%)出现皮瓣失败,采用PMMC处理。出现7例(7%)瘘和3例(3%)狭窄。比较两组并发症,瘘(P < .001)和狭窄(P = .001)方面B组均具有统计学意义上的显著优势。皮瓣成功率方面未发现显著差异。
在PH/CH术后重建中一线应用带长期SBPS的RF和ALT游离皮瓣可降低瘘和狭窄的发生率。
4。《喉镜》,2017年,第127卷,第2731 - 2737页