Division of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Neurosurgery. 2018 Feb 1;82(2):192-201. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx175.
Adult cervical deformity (ACD) classifications have not been implemented in a prospective ACD population and in conjunction with adult spinal deformity (ASD) classifications.
To characterize cervical deformity type and malalignment with 2 classifications (Ames-ACD and Schwab-ASD).
Retrospective review of a prospective multicenter ACD database. Inclusion: patients ≥18 yr with pre- and postoperative radiographs. Patients were classified with Ames-ACD and Schwab-ASD schemes. Ames-ACD descriptors (C = cervical, CT = cervicothoracic, T = thoracic, S = coronal, CVJ = craniovertebral) and alignment modifiers (cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA], T1 slope minus cervical lordosis [TS-CL], modified Japanese Ortphopaedic Association [mJOA] score, horizontal gaze) were assigned. Schwab-ASD curve type stratification and modifier grades were also designated. Deformity and alignment group distributions were compared with Pearson χ2/ANOVA.
Ames-ACD descriptors in 84 patients: C = 49 (58.3%), CT = 20 (23.8%), T = 9 (10.7%), S = 6 (7.1%). cSVA modifier grades differed in C, CT, and T deformities (P < .019). In C, TS-CL grade prevalence differed (P = .031). Among Ames-ACD modifiers, high (1+2) cSVA grades differed across deformities (C = 47.7%, CT = 89.5%, T = 77.8%, S = 50.0%, P = .013). Schwab-ASD curve type and presence (n = 74, T = 2, L = 6, D = 2) differed significantly in S deformities (P < .001). Higher Schwab-ASD pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis grades were less likely in Ames-ACD CT deformities (P = .027). Higher pelvic tilt grades were greater in high (1+2) cSVA (71.4% vs 36.0%, P = .015) and high (2+3) mJOA (24.0% vs 38.1%, P = .021) scores. Postoperatively, C and CT deformities had a trend toward lower cSVA grades, but only C deformities differed in TS-CL grade prevalence (0 = 31.3%, 1 = 12.2%, 2 = 56.1%, P = .007).
Cervical deformities displayed higher TS-CL grades and different cSVA grade distributions. Preoperative associations with global alignment modifiers and Ames-ACD descriptors were observed, though only cervical modifiers showed postoperative differences.
成人颈椎畸形(ACD)分类尚未在前瞻性 ACD 人群中与成人脊柱畸形(ASD)分类一起实施。
用 2 种分类(Ames-ACD 和 Schwab-ASD)来描述颈椎畸形的类型和失代偿。
回顾性分析前瞻性多中心 ACD 数据库。纳入标准:年龄≥ 18 岁,术前和术后均有影像学检查的患者。患者按照 Ames-ACD 和 Schwab-ASD 方案进行分类。分配了 Ames-ACD 描述符(C =颈椎,CT =颈胸段,T =胸椎,S =冠状,CVJ =颅颈段)和校正修饰符(颈椎矢状垂直轴 [cSVA],T1 斜率减去颈椎前凸 [TS-CL],改良日本矫形协会 [mJOA]评分,水平凝视)。还指定了 Schwab-ASD 曲线类型分层和修饰符等级。比较畸形和排列组的分布情况,采用 Pearson χ2/ANOVA。
84 例患者的 Ames-ACD 描述符:C = 49(58.3%),CT = 20(23.8%),T = 9(10.7%),S = 6(7.1%)。在 C、CT 和 T 畸形中,cSVA 修饰符等级不同(P <.019)。在 C 中,TS-CL 等级的流行率不同(P =.031)。在 Ames-ACD 修饰符中,高(1+2)cSVA 等级在不同的畸形中存在差异(C = 47.7%,CT = 89.5%,T = 77.8%,S = 50.0%,P =.013)。S 畸形的 Schwab-ASD 曲线类型和存在(n = 74,T = 2,L = 6,D = 2)存在显著差异(P <.001)。在 Ames-ACD CT 畸形中,Schwab-ASD 骨盆入射角减腰椎前凸度等级较低(P =.027)。高(1+2)cSVA(71.4%比 36.0%,P =.015)和高(2+3)mJOA(24.0%比 38.1%,P =.021)评分的骨盆倾斜度等级更高。术后,C 和 CT 畸形的 cSVA 等级有下降趋势,但只有 C 畸形的 TS-CL 等级流行率存在差异(0 = 31.3%,1 = 12.2%,2 = 56.1%,P =.007)。
颈椎畸形的 TS-CL 分级较高,cSVA 分级分布不同。术前与整体排列修饰符和 Ames-ACD 描述符存在相关性,但只有颈椎修饰符在术后有差异。