Suppr超能文献

基于现有颈椎和成人畸形分类方案,在就诊时和矫正后对成人颈椎畸形和残疾进行特征描述。

Characterizing Adult Cervical Deformity and Disability Based on Existing Cervical and Adult Deformity Classification Schemes at Presentation and Following Correction.

机构信息

Division of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2018 Feb 1;82(2):192-201. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx175.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adult cervical deformity (ACD) classifications have not been implemented in a prospective ACD population and in conjunction with adult spinal deformity (ASD) classifications.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize cervical deformity type and malalignment with 2 classifications (Ames-ACD and Schwab-ASD).

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospective multicenter ACD database. Inclusion: patients ≥18 yr with pre- and postoperative radiographs. Patients were classified with Ames-ACD and Schwab-ASD schemes. Ames-ACD descriptors (C = cervical, CT = cervicothoracic, T = thoracic, S = coronal, CVJ = craniovertebral) and alignment modifiers (cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA], T1 slope minus cervical lordosis [TS-CL], modified Japanese Ortphopaedic Association [mJOA] score, horizontal gaze) were assigned. Schwab-ASD curve type stratification and modifier grades were also designated. Deformity and alignment group distributions were compared with Pearson χ2/ANOVA.

RESULTS

Ames-ACD descriptors in 84 patients: C = 49 (58.3%), CT = 20 (23.8%), T = 9 (10.7%), S = 6 (7.1%). cSVA modifier grades differed in C, CT, and T deformities (P < .019). In C, TS-CL grade prevalence differed (P = .031). Among Ames-ACD modifiers, high (1+2) cSVA grades differed across deformities (C = 47.7%, CT = 89.5%, T = 77.8%, S = 50.0%, P = .013). Schwab-ASD curve type and presence (n = 74, T = 2, L = 6, D = 2) differed significantly in S deformities (P < .001). Higher Schwab-ASD pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis grades were less likely in Ames-ACD CT deformities (P = .027). Higher pelvic tilt grades were greater in high (1+2) cSVA (71.4% vs 36.0%, P = .015) and high (2+3) mJOA (24.0% vs 38.1%, P = .021) scores. Postoperatively, C and CT deformities had a trend toward lower cSVA grades, but only C deformities differed in TS-CL grade prevalence (0 = 31.3%, 1 = 12.2%, 2 = 56.1%, P = .007).

CONCLUSION

Cervical deformities displayed higher TS-CL grades and different cSVA grade distributions. Preoperative associations with global alignment modifiers and Ames-ACD descriptors were observed, though only cervical modifiers showed postoperative differences.

摘要

背景

成人颈椎畸形(ACD)分类尚未在前瞻性 ACD 人群中与成人脊柱畸形(ASD)分类一起实施。

目的

用 2 种分类(Ames-ACD 和 Schwab-ASD)来描述颈椎畸形的类型和失代偿。

方法

回顾性分析前瞻性多中心 ACD 数据库。纳入标准:年龄≥ 18 岁,术前和术后均有影像学检查的患者。患者按照 Ames-ACD 和 Schwab-ASD 方案进行分类。分配了 Ames-ACD 描述符(C =颈椎,CT =颈胸段,T =胸椎,S =冠状,CVJ =颅颈段)和校正修饰符(颈椎矢状垂直轴 [cSVA],T1 斜率减去颈椎前凸 [TS-CL],改良日本矫形协会 [mJOA]评分,水平凝视)。还指定了 Schwab-ASD 曲线类型分层和修饰符等级。比较畸形和排列组的分布情况,采用 Pearson χ2/ANOVA。

结果

84 例患者的 Ames-ACD 描述符:C = 49(58.3%),CT = 20(23.8%),T = 9(10.7%),S = 6(7.1%)。在 C、CT 和 T 畸形中,cSVA 修饰符等级不同(P <.019)。在 C 中,TS-CL 等级的流行率不同(P =.031)。在 Ames-ACD 修饰符中,高(1+2)cSVA 等级在不同的畸形中存在差异(C = 47.7%,CT = 89.5%,T = 77.8%,S = 50.0%,P =.013)。S 畸形的 Schwab-ASD 曲线类型和存在(n = 74,T = 2,L = 6,D = 2)存在显著差异(P <.001)。在 Ames-ACD CT 畸形中,Schwab-ASD 骨盆入射角减腰椎前凸度等级较低(P =.027)。高(1+2)cSVA(71.4%比 36.0%,P =.015)和高(2+3)mJOA(24.0%比 38.1%,P =.021)评分的骨盆倾斜度等级更高。术后,C 和 CT 畸形的 cSVA 等级有下降趋势,但只有 C 畸形的 TS-CL 等级流行率存在差异(0 = 31.3%,1 = 12.2%,2 = 56.1%,P =.007)。

结论

颈椎畸形的 TS-CL 分级较高,cSVA 分级分布不同。术前与整体排列修饰符和 Ames-ACD 描述符存在相关性,但只有颈椎修饰符在术后有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验