Suppr超能文献

开颅术后抗菌药物预防的安全性与有效性:一项决策模型分析

Safety and Efficacy of Antibacterial Prophylaxis After Craniotomy: A Decision Model Analysis.

作者信息

Alotaibi Amal F, Mekary Rania A, Zaidi Hasan A, Smith Timothy R, Pandya Ankur

机构信息

MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Cushing Neurosurgical Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:906-912.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.126. Epub 2017 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic prophylaxis has revolutionized the safety of neurosurgical procedures in the last century. Today, the clinician's drug of choice before surgery often is based on the antibiotic's resistance profile and drug-induced complications.

METHODS

A decision tree model was developed to compare cefazolin (cephalosporin), vancomycin, or their combination on 90-day mortality postcraniotomy. We modeled the infection type (methicillin-sensitive, methicillin-resistant, or other organisms), antibiotic-related complications that could affect mortality (e.g., renal injury), and Clostridium difficile infections. Parameters' values were extracted from published sources. One-way sensitivity analysis was used to examine results' robustness to plausible variations in input parameter values.

RESULTS

The expected value (EV) of 90-day survival was the greatest among patients on cefazolin (EV = 0.9145), followed by patients on vancomycin (EV = 0.8898), and patients on the combination (EV = 0.8886). Cefazolin was the preferred strategy in most one-way sensitivity analyses, except for a few cases in which other options could be preferred based on expected survival. Vancomycin was preferred if kidney injury risk was ≤0.056 conditional on vancomycin intake or ≥12% conditional on cefazolin intake. The combination was preferred if kidney injury conditional risk was ≤0.083 or that for kidney injury-mortality was ≤4.7%. Varying other risks (e.g., postsurgical-site infections (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, or other); Clostridium difficile infections' risks conditional on each antibiotic) did not change the preferred strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

According to this decision analysis, patients undergoing a craniotomy who had cefazolin as prophylaxis had a slightly greater expected survival compared with other strategies. These results were sensitive to changes in kidney injury development risk and kidney failure-associated death.

摘要

背景

抗生素预防在上个世纪彻底改变了神经外科手术的安全性。如今,临床医生术前的首选药物通常基于抗生素的耐药谱和药物引起的并发症。

方法

开发了一种决策树模型,以比较头孢唑林(头孢菌素)、万古霉素或它们的组合对开颅术后90天死亡率的影响。我们对感染类型(甲氧西林敏感、耐甲氧西林或其他微生物)、可能影响死亡率的抗生素相关并发症(如肾损伤)以及艰难梭菌感染进行了建模。参数值从已发表的资料中提取。采用单向敏感性分析来检验结果对输入参数值合理变化的稳健性。

结果

头孢唑林组患者90天生存的期望值(EV)最高(EV = 0.9145),其次是万古霉素组患者(EV = 0.8898),联合用药组患者(EV = 0.8886)。在大多数单向敏感性分析中,头孢唑林是首选策略,除了少数情况下根据预期生存率其他选择可能更优。如果万古霉素摄入条件下肾损伤风险≤0.056或头孢唑林摄入条件下≥12%,则首选万古霉素。如果肾损伤条件风险≤0.083或肾损伤 - 死亡率条件风险≤4.7%,则首选联合用药。改变其他风险(如手术部位感染(耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌或其他);每种抗生素条件下艰难梭菌感染的风险)不会改变首选策略。

结论

根据这项决策分析,接受开颅手术且以头孢唑林作为预防用药的患者与其他策略相比,预期生存率略高。这些结果对肾损伤发生风险和肾衰竭相关死亡的变化敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验