Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Sep;12(9):1368-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 30.
Increasing evidence has demonstrated that exon 19 deletions (Del19) and L858R mutation in EGFR have different prognostic and predictive roles in NSCLC. We aimed to investigate whether these two mutations produced differences in mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Consecutive patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and underwent postprogression biopsy were enrolled. Mechanisms including T790M mutation, mesenchymal-epithelial transition proto-oncogene (MET) amplification, and histological transformation, as well as KRAS, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha gene (PIK3CA) mutation, and anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) fusion, were analyzed.
The prevalence of T790M mutation was significantly higher in the Del19 subgroup than that in L858R subgroup (50.4% versus 36.5%, p = 0.043). Apart from this, there was no difference in other mechanisms including MET amplification and histological transformation. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with T790M mutation was 36.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.9-41.2), which was significantly longer than the 26.5 months (95% CI: 24.0-29.0) in MET-positive patients, 19.7 months (95% CI: 18.2-21.2) in patients with histological transformation, and 23.0 months (95% CI: 17.4-28.6) in the KRAS/PIK3CA/ALK-altered population (p = 0.021). The hazard ratios of the MET-amplification subgroup and subgroup with histological transformation were 1.809-fold and 2.370-fold higher than that in T790M-positive subgroup. The median OS times were months 33.3 (95% CI: 28.9-37.7) in the Del19 subgroup and 26.4 months (95% CI: 23.2-29.6) in the L858R subgroup (p = 0.028). However, in multivariable analysis adjusted for T790M genotype, the EGFR mutation subtype was no longer found to be significant.
Significant OS benefit was observed in patients with T790M mutation, suggesting that a larger proportion of T790M mutation might contribute to the better survival of patients with Del19.
越来越多的证据表明,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)外显子 19 缺失(Del19)和 L858R 突变在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中具有不同的预后和预测作用。我们旨在研究这两种突变是否在 EGFR 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的耐药机制中产生差异。
连续入组接受 EGFR 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后发生耐药并接受进展后活检的晚期 EGFR 突变型 NSCLC 患者。分析了包括 T790M 突变、间充质-上皮转化原癌基因(MET)扩增、组织学转化以及 KRAS、磷酸肌醇-4,5-二磷酸 3-激酶催化亚单位α基因(PIK3CA)突变和间变性淋巴瘤受体酪氨酸激酶基因(ALK)融合在内的机制。
Del19 亚组中 T790M 突变的发生率明显高于 L858R 亚组(50.4% vs. 36.5%,p=0.043)。除此之外,其他机制如 MET 扩增和组织学转化无差异。T790M 突变患者的中位总生存期(OS)为 36.0 个月(95%置信区间 [CI]:30.9-41.2),明显长于 MET 阳性患者的 26.5 个月(95% CI:24.0-29.0)、组织学转化患者的 19.7 个月(95% CI:18.2-21.2)和 KRAS/PIK3CA/ALK 改变人群的 23.0 个月(95% CI:17.4-28.6)(p=0.021)。MET 扩增亚组和组织学转化亚组的危险比分别是 T790M 阳性亚组的 1.809 倍和 2.370 倍。Del19 亚组的中位 OS 时间为 33.3 个月(95% CI:28.9-37.7),L858R 亚组为 26.4 个月(95% CI:23.2-29.6)(p=0.028)。然而,在调整 T790M 基因型的多变量分析中,EGFR 突变亚型不再具有统计学意义。
T790M 突变患者的 OS 获益显著,提示 Del19 中 T790M 突变的比例较大可能有助于患者的生存获益。