Virginia Commonwealth University.
J Res Adolesc. 2016 Sep;26(3):509-523. doi: 10.1111/jora.12208. Epub 2015 May 21.
Two studies examined the factor structure of a modified version of the Safe Dates dating aggression scale and evaluated whether dating aggression is distinct from general aggression during early adolescence. Analyses were conducted on a derivation sample of 3,894 adolescents from 37 schools (Study 1) and an independent cross-validation sample of 938 middle school youth (Study 2). Categorical confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor model (perpetration and victimization) over models differentiating psychological and physical forms of aggression. The model was invariant across time, sex, grade, and season. Study 2 also supported dating aggression as distinct from general aggression. Results supported measuring dating aggression perpetration and victimization as latent constructs represented by ordered categorical indicators that capture item severity and frequency.
两项研究考察了改良版 Safe Dates 约会暴力量表的因子结构,并评估了在青少年早期,约会暴力是否与一般攻击行为不同。分析是在来自 37 所学校的 3894 名青少年的推导样本(研究 1)和 938 名中学生的独立交叉验证样本(研究 2)上进行的。分类验证性因素分析支持两因素模型(施害者和受害者)优于区分心理和身体形式攻击的模型。该模型在时间、性别、年级和季节上是不变的。研究 2 还支持将约会暴力视为与一般攻击行为不同。研究结果支持将约会暴力的实施和受害作为潜在的结构进行测量,这些结构由有序分类指标表示,这些指标捕捉项目的严重程度和频率。