Jensen Gail M, Nordstrom Terrence, Mostrom Elizabeth, Hack Laurita M, Gwyer Janet
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178 (USA).
Department of Physical Therapy, Samuel Merritt University, Oakland, California.
Phys Ther. 2017 Sep 1;97(9):857-874. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx061.
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching commissioned the Preparation for the Professions Program, a qualitative study of professional education in 5 professions: medicine, nursing, law, engineering, and clergy. These studies identified curricular structures, instructional practices, assessment approaches, and environmental characteristics that support the preparation of professionals and led to educational reforms. The physical therapy profession has not had any in-depth, national investigation of physical therapist education since the Catherine Worthingham studies conducted more than 50 years ago.
This research was a Carnegie-type study, investigating elements of excellence and innovation in academic and clinical physical therapist education in the United States.
Five physical therapist education researchers from across the United States used a qualitative multiple-case study design.
Six academic and 5 clinical programs were selected for the study. The academic institutions and clinical agencies studied were diverse in size, institutional setting, geography, and role in residency education. Qualitative case studies were generated from review of artifacts, field observations, and interviews (individual and focus group), and they provided the data for the study.
A conceptual framework grounded in 3 major dimensions was generated, with 8 supporting elements: (1) culture of excellence (shared beliefs and values, leadership and vision, drive for excellence, and partnerships), (2) praxis of learning (signature pedagogy, practice-based learning, creating adaptive learners, and professional formation), and (3) organizational structures and resources.
Building on the work of the Carnegie Foundation's Preparation for the Professions Program, a conceptual model was developed, representing the dimensions and elements of excellence in physical therapist education that is centered on the foundational importance of a nexus of linked and highly valued aims of being learner centered and patient centered in all learning environments, both academic and clinical.
美国卡内基教学促进基金会委托开展了“职业准备项目”,这是一项针对医学、护理、法律、工程和神职人员这5个职业的职业教育的定性研究。这些研究确定了支持专业人员培养的课程结构、教学实践、评估方法和环境特征,并引发了教育改革。自50多年前凯瑟琳·沃辛厄姆研究以来,物理治疗行业尚未进行过任何深入的全国性物理治疗师教育调查。
本研究是一项类似卡内基式的研究,旨在调查美国物理治疗师学术教育和临床教育中的卓越与创新要素。
来自美国各地的5名物理治疗师教育研究人员采用了定性多案例研究设计。
选取了6个学术项目和5个临床项目进行研究。所研究的学术机构和临床机构在规模、机构设置、地理位置以及住院医师教育中的作用等方面各不相同。通过对人工制品的审查、实地观察以及访谈(个人访谈和焦点小组访谈)生成定性案例研究,这些案例研究为该研究提供了数据。
生成了一个基于3个主要维度的概念框架,包含8个支持要素:(1)卓越文化(共同信念和价值观、领导力与愿景、追求卓越的动力以及伙伴关系),(2)学习实践(标志性教学法、基于实践的学习、培养适应性学习者以及专业形成),(3)组织结构与资源。
在卡内基基金会职业准备项目的工作基础上,开发了一个概念模型,该模型代表了物理治疗师教育中的卓越维度和要素,其核心在于在所有学习环境(学术环境和临床环境)中以学习者为中心和以患者为中心这一相互关联且高度重视的目标关系的基础重要性。