Memarian Maryam, Sadighpour Leyla, Nosratpour Rojman, Fard Mohammad J K
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Golestan University of Medical Sciences.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2017 Jun;25(2):79-85. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_01624Memarian07.
The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of zirconia FPDs fabricated by different laboratory CAD/CAM system. Thirty-six FPD zirconia frameworks were fabricated on corresponding epoxy resin models that were duplicated from a master model of mandibular second premolar and second molar mounted in an acrylic block to simulate missing first mandibular tooth. Frameworks were divided into groups (n = 12) of three laboratory CAD/CAM systems: Cercon, Amann Girrbach, and Zirkonzahn. For the two factors, system and abutment type, the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) was measured before cementation. Internal fit was also determined at three sites after cementation. The data were analyzed statistically (α = 0.05). The effects of system and tooth type were not significant for AMD (p ⟩ 0.05). Both factors showed influence on the internal fit of FPDs (p ⟨ 0.05). Molars showed larger gaps in axial and occlusal sites (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003), and Cercon led in better occlusal adaptation compared with Amann Girrbach (p = 0.013). The systems tested did not show differences in AMD, despite different incorporated components. However, internal fit was significantly different between tooth type and system.
本研究的目的是比较不同实验室计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)系统制作的氧化锆固定局部义齿(FPD)的精度。在从安装在丙烯酸块中的下颌第二前磨牙和第二磨牙的主模型复制而来的相应环氧树脂模型上制作了36个FPD氧化锆框架,以模拟缺失的下颌第一颗牙齿。框架被分为三组(n = 12),分别采用三种实验室CAD/CAM系统制作:Cercon、Amann Girrbach和Zirkonzahn。对于系统和基牙类型这两个因素,在粘接前测量绝对边缘差异(AMD)。粘接后还在三个部位测定了内部适合性。对数据进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。系统和牙齿类型对AMD的影响不显著(p>0.05)。这两个因素均对FPD的内部适合性有影响(p<0.05)。磨牙在轴向和咬合部位显示出更大的间隙(p = 0.001和p = 0.003),与Amann Girrbach相比,Cercon在咬合适应性方面表现更好(p = 0.013)。尽管所含组件不同,但所测试的系统在AMD方面未显示出差异。然而,牙齿类型和系统之间的内部适合性存在显著差异。