1 Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
2 Division of Emergency Medicine, Charite, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Sep;7(6):570-576. doi: 10.1177/2048872617710791. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
Copeptin is currently understood as a quantitative marker of endogenous stress. It rises rapidly in multiple acute disorders including acute myocardial infarction. As a single variable, it has only modest diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction. However, the use of copeptin within a dual-marker strategy together with conventional cardiac troponin increases the diagnostic accuracy and particularly the negative predictive value of cardiac troponin alone for acute myocardial infarction. The rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction is the only application in acute cardiac care mature enough to merit consideration for routine clinical care. However, the dual-marker approach seems to provide only very small incremental value when used in combination with sensitive or high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. This review aims to update and educate regarding the potential and the procedural details, as well as the caveats and challenges of using copeptin in clinical practice.
copeptin 目前被理解为内源性应激的定量标志物。它在多种急性疾病中迅速升高,包括急性心肌梗死。作为一个单一变量,它对急性心肌梗死的诊断准确性只有中等程度。然而,在双标志物策略中使用 copeptin 与传统的心肌肌钙蛋白一起使用,可提高心肌肌钙蛋白单独用于急性心肌梗死的诊断准确性,特别是阴性预测值。快速排除急性心肌梗死是唯一在急性心脏护理中应用成熟到足以考虑常规临床护理的应用。然而,当与敏感或高敏心肌肌钙蛋白检测联合使用时,双标志物方法似乎只提供非常小的增量价值。本综述旨在更新和教育有关在临床实践中使用 copeptin 的潜在价值、程序细节、注意事项和挑战。