Feltovich Helen
Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare, Utah Valley Hospital, Provo, Utah; and the Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):51-63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002106.
Since ancient times, cervical assessment for predicting timing of delivery has relied primarily on digital (subjective) assessment of dilatation, softening, and length. To date, transvaginal ultrasound cervical length is the only one of these parameters that meets criteria for a biomarker; no objective, quantitative measure of cervical dilatation or softening has gained clinical acceptance. This review discusses how the cervix has been assessed from ancient times to the present day and how a precision medicine approach could improve understanding of not only the cervix, but also parturition in general.
自古以来,用于预测分娩时间的宫颈评估主要依赖于对宫颈扩张、软化和长度的指诊(主观)评估。迄今为止,经阴道超声测量的宫颈长度是这些参数中唯一符合生物标志物标准的;目前尚无客观、定量的宫颈扩张或软化测量方法获得临床认可。本文综述了从古至今宫颈评估的方式,以及精准医学方法如何不仅能增进对宫颈的理解,还能提升对分娩整体过程的认识。