AlHeresh Rawan, LaValley Michael P, Coster Wendy, Keysor Julie J
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions (Dr AlHeresh); Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Medicine (Dr LaValley); Department of Occupational Therapy (Dr Coster); Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training (Dr Keysor), Boston University Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jun;59(6):e112-e118. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001044.
To evaluate construct validity and scoring methods of the world health organization-health and work performance questionnaire (HPQ) for people with arthritis.
Construct validity was examined through hypothesis testing using the recommended guidelines of the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN).
The HPQ using the absolute scoring method showed moderate construct validity as four of the seven hypotheses were met. The HPQ using the relative scoring method had weak construct validity as only one of the seven hypotheses were met.
The absolute scoring method for the HPQ is superior in construct validity to the relative scoring method in assessing work performance among people with arthritis and related rheumatic conditions; however, more research is needed to further explore other psychometric properties of the HPQ.
评估世界卫生组织健康与工作绩效问卷(HPQ)在关节炎患者中的结构效度和评分方法。
根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)的推荐指南,通过假设检验来检验结构效度。
采用绝对评分法的HPQ显示出中等结构效度,因为七个假设中有四个得到满足。采用相对评分法的HPQ结构效度较弱,因为七个假设中只有一个得到满足。
在评估关节炎及相关风湿性疾病患者的工作绩效时,HPQ的绝对评分法在结构效度方面优于相对评分法;然而,需要更多研究来进一步探索HPQ的其他心理测量特性。