Mahmoud Omar, Kilic Sarah, Khan Atif J, Beriwal Sushil, Small William
Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ann Transl Med. 2017 May;5(10):207. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.102.
The management of locally advanced cervical cancer relies on brachytherapy (BT) as an integral part of the radiotherapy delivery armamentarium. Occasionally, intracavitary BT is neither possible nor available. In these circumstances, post-external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) interstitial brachytherapy and/or hysterectomy may represent viable options that must be adequately executed in a timely manner. However, if these options are not applicable due to patient related or facility related reasons, a formal contingency plan should be in place. Innovative EBRT techniques such as intensity modulated and stereotactic radiotherapy may be considered for patients unable to undergo brachytherapy. Relying on provocative arguments and recent data, this review explores the rationale for and limitations of non-brachytherapy substitutes in that setting aiming to establish a formal process for the optimal execution of this alternative plan.
局部晚期宫颈癌的治疗依赖近距离放疗(BT)作为放射治疗手段不可或缺的一部分。偶尔,腔内BT既不可行也无法实施。在这种情况下,外照射放疗(EBRT)后行组织间插植近距离放疗和/或子宫切除术可能是可行的选择,必须及时妥善实施。然而,如果由于患者相关或设备相关原因这些选择不适用,则应制定正式的应急计划。对于无法接受近距离放疗的患者,可考虑采用强度调制放疗和立体定向放疗等创新型EBRT技术。基于有争议的观点和最新数据,本综述探讨了在这种情况下非近距离放疗替代方案的理论依据和局限性,旨在建立一个优化执行此替代方案的正式流程。