Suppr超能文献

超声引导下桡动脉置管可提高麻醉住院医师的成功率:一项随机研究。

Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterisation increases the success rate among anaesthesiology residents: a randomised study.

作者信息

Gopalasingam Nigopan, Hansen Marlene A, Thorn Sofie, Sloth Erik, Juhl-Olsen Peter

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N - Denmark.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2017 Nov 17;18(6):546-551. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000702. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The palpation technique is generally used for radial artery catheterisation, but is associated with a high rate of failure and complications. Dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) is a new ultrasound-guided technique. We aimed to compare the traditional palpation technique with DNTP performed by four anaesthesiology residents.

METHODS

The study was a randomised, controlled, patient-blinded, crossover study. Fourty patients underwent bilateral radial artery catheterisation using both techniques. The primary endpoint was the first attempt success rate. The secondary endpoints were: 1) number of skin perforations, 2) number of needle retractions, 3) needle manipulation time, 4) total time, 5) attempts lasting >180 seconds, 6) number of catheters used, 7) frequency of aborted attempts or crossovers, and 8) pain scores (VAS).

RESULTS

The first attempt success rate was significantly higher in the DNTP group compared with the palpation group (36/40 vs. 28/40, p = 0.022).The palpation technique group required a higher number of skin perforations (44 vs. 60, p = 0.016), needle retractions (p = 0.001) and catheters (42 vs. 52, p = 0.011) compared with the DNTP group. Neither the total time required for arterial catheterisation, the needle manipulation time nor the VAS scores were significantly different between the groups (all p>0.407). Aborted attempts were only seen in the palpation group (7/40, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterisation using the DNTP technique is superior to the standard palpation technique. This study favours the ultrasound-guided DNTP technique as the first choice rather than merely being viewed as a rescue procedure.

摘要

引言

触诊技术通常用于桡动脉置管,但失败率和并发症发生率较高。动态针尖定位(DNTP)是一种新的超声引导技术。我们旨在比较传统触诊技术与由四名麻醉科住院医师进行的DNTP技术。

方法

本研究为随机、对照、患者盲法交叉研究。40例患者使用两种技术进行双侧桡动脉置管。主要终点是首次尝试成功率。次要终点包括:1)皮肤穿孔次数;2)针头回撤次数;3)针头操作时间;4)总时间;5)持续时间>180秒的尝试次数;6)使用的导管数量;7)放弃尝试或交叉的频率;8)疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分法)。

结果

与触诊组相比,DNTP组的首次尝试成功率显著更高(36/40对28/40,p = 0.022)。与DNTP组相比,触诊技术组需要更多的皮肤穿孔(44对60,p = 0.016)、针头回撤次数(p = 0.001)和导管数量(42对52,p = 0.011)。两组之间动脉置管所需的总时间、针头操作时间或视觉模拟评分法评分均无显著差异(所有p>0.407)。仅在触诊组中出现放弃尝试的情况(7/40,p = 0.016)。

结论

使用DNTP技术的超声引导动脉置管优于标准触诊技术。本研究支持将超声引导的DNTP技术作为首选,而不仅仅将其视为一种补救措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验