Medical University Innsbruck, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Division of Psychiatry I, Innsbruck, Austria.
Medical University Innsbruck, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Division of Psychiatry I, Innsbruck, Austria.
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Oct;256:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.010.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies frequently differ with regard to study dropouts. The present naturalistic follow-up investigation aimed to shed a light on this issue by evaluating the time to and the reasons for study dropout in patients suffering from schizophrenia who started monotherapy with an oral new-generation antipsychotic. To this end, psychopathological symptoms and safety data were assessed in 194 patients who were followed up to a maximum observation period of twelve months. 9.3% of study participants completed the study. The mean time to study dropout was 2.6 ± 2.7 months with almost two thirds of patients dropping out within three months. 44.3% discontinued medication at the date of study dropout, the remainders dropped out due to withdrawal of written consent, logistic reasons, or nonappearance to the study visit ("loss to follow-up"), which were not necessarily to be equated with cessation of the antipsychotic. These findings indicate that in contrast to RCTs, dropout of observational studies is not necessarily associated with drug discontinuation. Accordingly, systematic differences between trial designs need to be considered when interpreting the results of clinical trials.
随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究在研究脱落方面经常存在差异。本自然随访研究旨在通过评估开始接受口服新一代抗精神病药物单药治疗的精神分裂症患者的研究脱落时间和原因,阐明这一问题。为此,对 194 名患者进行了为期 12 个月的随访,评估了他们的精神病理症状和安全性数据。9.3%的研究参与者完成了研究。研究脱落的平均时间为 2.6±2.7 个月,近三分之二的患者在三个月内脱落。44.3%的患者在研究脱落时停止用药,其余患者因撤回书面同意、逻辑原因或未参加研究就诊(“失访”)而脱落,不一定等同于停止使用抗精神病药物。这些发现表明,与 RCT 相比,观察性研究的脱落不一定与药物停药相关。因此,在解释临床试验结果时,需要考虑试验设计之间的系统差异。