Voss Rachel K, Feng Lei, Lee Jeffrey E, Perrier Nancy D, Graham Paul H, Hyde Samuel M, Nieves-Munoz Frances, Cabanillas Maria E, Waguespack Steven G, Cote Gilbert J, Gagel Robert F, Grubbs Elizabeth G
Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas, MD Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Aug 1;102(8):2807-2813. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00317.
High-risk RET mutations (codon 634) are associated with earlier development of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and presumed increased aggressiveness compared with moderate-risk RET mutations.
To determine whether high-risk RET mutations are more aggressive.
Retrospective cohort study using institutional multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 registry.
Tertiary cancer care center.
Patients with MTC and moderate- or high-risk germline RET mutation.
None (observational study).
Proxies for aggressiveness were overall survival (OS) and time to distant metastatic disease (DMD).
A total of 127 moderate-risk and 135 high-risk patients were included (n = 262). Median age at diagnosis was 42.3 years (range, 6.4 to 86.4 years; mean, 41.6 years) for moderate-risk mutations and 23.0 years (range, 3.7 to 66.8 years; mean, 25.6 years) for high-risk mutations (P < 0.0001). Moderate-risk patients had more T3/T4 tumors at diagnosis (P = 0.03), but there was no significant difference for N or M stage and no significant difference in OS (P = 0.40). From multivariable analysis for OS, increasing age [hazard ratio (HR), 1.05/y; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03 to 1.08], T3/T4 tumor (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.22 to 6.11), and M1 status at diagnosis (HR, 3.93; 95% CI, 1.61 to 9.59) were significantly associated with worse OS but high-risk mutation was not (P = 0.40). No significant difference was observed for development of DMD (P = 0.33). From multivariable analysis for DMD, only N1 status at diagnosis was significant (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.03 to 4.27).
Patients with high- and moderate-risk RET mutations had similar OS and development of DMD after MTC diagnosis and therefore similarly aggressive clinical courses. High-risk connotes increased disease aggressiveness; thus, future guidelines should consider RET mutation classification by disease onset (early vs late) rather than by risk (high vs moderate).
与中度风险的RET突变相比,高风险RET突变(密码子634)与甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)的早期发生相关,且推测其侵袭性增加。
确定高风险RET突变是否更具侵袭性。
使用机构性2型多发性内分泌肿瘤登记处进行的回顾性队列研究。
三级癌症护理中心。
患有MTC且有中度或高风险种系RET突变的患者。
无(观察性研究)。
侵袭性的替代指标为总生存期(OS)和远处转移疾病发生时间(DMD)。
共纳入127例中度风险患者和135例高风险患者(n = 262)。中度风险突变患者诊断时的中位年龄为42.3岁(范围6.4至86.4岁;平均41.6岁),高风险突变患者为23.0岁(范围3.7至66.8岁;平均25.6岁)(P < 0.0001)。中度风险患者诊断时T3/T4期肿瘤更多(P = 0.03),但N或M分期无显著差异,OS也无显著差异(P = 0.40)。从OS的多变量分析来看,年龄增加[风险比(HR),1.05/年;95%置信区间(CI),1.03至1.08]、T3/T4期肿瘤(HR,2.73;95%CI,1.22至6.11)以及诊断时M1状态(HR,3.93;95%CI,1.61至9.59)与较差的OS显著相关,但高风险突变并非如此(P = 0.40)。DMD的发生无显著差异(P = 0.33)。从DMD的多变量分析来看,仅诊断时N1状态具有显著性(HR,2.10;95%CI,1.03至4.27)。
MTC诊断后,高风险和中度风险RET突变患者的OS和DMD发生情况相似,因此临床病程的侵袭性相似。高风险意味着疾病侵袭性增加;因此,未来指南应考虑按发病时间(早发与晚发)而非风险(高风险与中度风险)对RET突变进行分类。