Bitar Abbas, Vijayakrishnan Rajakrishnan, Lenneman Andrew, Birks Emma, Massey Todd, Slaughter Mark, Abramov Dmitry
University of Louisville Hospital-Advanced Heart Failure, Louisville, KY, USA.
Artif Organs. 2017 Dec;41(12):1092-1098. doi: 10.1111/aor.12910. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
Pump thrombosis and hemolysis in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Intensification of anticoagulation has been suggested as potential therapy, with mixed results. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of adding eptifibatide with or without an anticoagulation agent in managing patients with LVAD presenting with hemolysis and suspected pump thrombosis. This retrospective single center study included all patients who presented with their first episode of suspected pump thrombosis and were treated with eptifibatide with or without an anticoagulant between March 1, 2011 and July 30, 2015. A total of 27 patients (23 HeartMate II, 4 HeartWare) were identified. The average age was 55 years (range 19-75) and time from implant to event averaged 513 days (range 35-1760). The average lactate dehydrogenase on presentation was 1111 and 63% of patients had power elevations. The average international normalized ratio (INR) on admission was 2.4, with INR of ≥2 in 21/27 patients. All patients received eptifibatide: 10 received eptifibatide only, 9 received eptifibatide and argatroban, and 8 received eptifibatide and heparin. Warfarin was continued in 25/27 patients. Overall, 21 patients (77.8%) were successfully treated medically, 5 (18.5%) underwent pump exchange, and 1 (3.7%) died. There were no differences in outcomes or complications between the three treatment groups. Despite initial success, 12/21 patients developed repeat episodes of hemolysis at 1 year. The 1-year survival in the patients treated medically was 90% and surgically was 60%. Our experience indicates that medical therapy for hemolysis and suspected LVAD thrombosis with warfarin and eptifibatide alone or in combination with argatroban or heparin appears safe and may be effective, although the episodes of recurrent hemolysis after medical management remain high.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者的泵血栓形成和溶血与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。抗凝强化已被建议作为潜在治疗方法,但结果不一。本研究的目的是评估在伴有溶血和疑似泵血栓形成的LVAD患者中加用依替巴肽(无论是否联用抗凝剂)的安全性和有效性。这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2011年3月1日至2015年7月30日期间首次出现疑似泵血栓形成并接受依替巴肽治疗(无论是否联用抗凝剂)的所有患者。共确定了27例患者(23例HeartMate II,4例HeartWare)。平均年龄为55岁(范围19 - 75岁),从植入到事件发生的平均时间为513天(范围35 - 1760天)。就诊时平均乳酸脱氢酶为1111,63%的患者乳酸脱氢酶升高。入院时平均国际标准化比值(INR)为2.4,21/27例患者INR≥2。所有患者均接受依替巴肽治疗:10例仅接受依替巴肽,9例接受依替巴肽和阿加曲班,8例接受依替巴肽和肝素。25/27例患者继续使用华法林。总体而言,21例患者(77.8%)经药物治疗成功,5例(18.5%)接受了泵更换,1例(3.7%)死亡。三个治疗组在结局或并发症方面无差异。尽管最初取得成功,但12/21例患者在1年时出现了溶血复发。经药物治疗患者的1年生存率为90%,手术治疗患者为60%。我们的经验表明,单独使用华法林和依替巴肽或与阿加曲班或肝素联合用于溶血和疑似LVAD血栓形成的药物治疗似乎是安全的,可能也是有效的,尽管药物治疗后溶血复发的发生率仍然很高。