Suppr超能文献

不要将养老院中的多学科任务管理与跨专业护理混为一谈!

Do not confuse multidisciplinary task management in nursing homes with interprofessional care!

作者信息

Tsakitzidis Giannoula, Anthierens Sibyl, Timmermans Olaf, Truijen Steven, Meulemans Herman, Van Royen Paul

机构信息

1Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,University of Antwerp,Antwerp,Belgium.

2Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute,University of Antwerp,Antwerp,Belgium.

出版信息

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Nov;18(6):591-602. doi: 10.1017/S146342361700024X. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Problem statement Little is known about how interprofessional healthcare providers in nursing homes work together. We know that interprofessional teamwork evolves from trial and error learning and so interprofessional collaboration has to be actively taught. This study aims to gain insights in the perception of professionals towards interprofessional collaboration in nursing homes and the factors that have an impact on interprofessional collaboration. Approach A qualitative descriptive methodology using focus group interviews and additional semi-structured interviews was performed. In total three focus group sessions with healthcare providers from different disciplines were held and additionally nine semi-structured interviews were executed. A thematic analysis was performed. The transcripts were read to immerse in the data and initial ideas were noted. Both open coding (identification of primary themes) and axial coding (analysis of relationships among themes) were conducted and re-focussed into potential themes. Findings Four main themes emerge from the analysis: context, collaboration, care and experience. From the findings it seems that healthcare teams in nursing homes work as 'separated groups'. A lot of collaboration is perceived, but no common vision or responsibility sharing is found. The role description of the different disciplines does not always seem clear or is not always explicit.

CONCLUSION

In usual care the perceived interactions between professionals are called collaboration. Obviously physicians and all healthcare professionals do not work interprofessionally according to definitions from the literature. This study provided evidence of the awareness that interprofessional collaboration in usual care is situational and fragmentary organised.

摘要

未标注

问题陈述

对于养老院中的跨专业医疗服务提供者如何协同工作,我们了解甚少。我们知道跨专业团队合作是从试错学习中发展而来的,因此必须积极传授跨专业协作。本研究旨在深入了解专业人员对养老院中跨专业协作的看法以及对跨专业协作产生影响的因素。

方法

采用焦点小组访谈和额外的半结构化访谈进行定性描述性研究方法。总共与来自不同学科的医疗服务提供者举行了三次焦点小组会议,并另外进行了九次半结构化访谈。进行了主题分析。阅读访谈记录以深入了解数据并记录初步想法。同时进行了开放式编码(识别主要主题)和轴心式编码(分析主题之间的关系),并重新聚焦于潜在主题。

结果

分析得出四个主要主题

背景、协作、护理和体验。从研究结果来看,养老院中的医疗团队似乎是“各自为政的群体”。虽然存在大量协作,但未发现共同愿景或责任分担。不同学科的角色描述似乎并不总是清晰或明确。

结论

在常规护理中,专业人员之间的互动被称为协作。显然,根据文献定义,医生和所有医疗专业人员并非跨专业工作。本研究证明了这样一种认识,即常规护理中的跨专业协作是情境性的且组织零散。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验