Wang Jianjun, Liu Qi, Zhou Xiaodie, He Yan, Guo Qing, Shi Qunli, Eriksson Staffan, Zhou Ji, He Ellen, Skog Sven
1 Department of Pathology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
2 Department of Gynaecology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Tumour Biol. 2017 Jun;39(6):1010428317706479. doi: 10.1177/1010428317706479.
Cancer is a disease with abnormally proliferating cells and therefore proliferation rate is an important index for assessing tumour growth. Ki-67 is a commonly used proliferation marker considered to be an unfavourable prognostic marker in some tumors, while Thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) is an interesting proliferation marker because its levels are highly dependent on the growth stage of cells. To define the immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression of the TK1 in patients with ovarian serous adenocarcinoma and establish its potential role as a new biomarker for progressive disease, we analyzed the expression patterns of TK1 and Ki-67 in 109 patients with ovarian serous adenocarcinoma. TK1 and Ki-67 expression both showed a statistically significant correlation to MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) grade, but not to age, tumour size, lymph node metastasis or pathological TNM (pTNM) stages. TK1 expression, MDACC grades, pathological stages and lymph node metastasis correlate to relapse incident rate and overall survival, but Ki-67 does not. Although TK1 expression, MDACC grade, pTNM stage and lymph node metastasis significantly correlate to relapse in the Cox univariate analysis, in the multivariate Cox analysis only TK1 expression and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors. The overall survival also correlated significantly to TK1 expression, MDACC grade, pTNM stage and lymph node metastasis in the Cox univariate analysis. However, only the pTNM stage was found to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in the Cox multivariate analysis. Therefore, though TK1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for relapse, but not for survival, TK1 is a more informative expression than Ki-67 for LI, relapse and overall survival rates. Thus, when TK1 is combined with MDACC grading, pTNM staging and lymph node metastasis, IHC determination of TK1 expression may improve the overall prediction of prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer.
癌症是一种细胞异常增殖的疾病,因此增殖率是评估肿瘤生长的重要指标。Ki-67是一种常用的增殖标志物,在某些肿瘤中被认为是不良预后标志物,而胸苷激酶1(TK1)是一种有趣的增殖标志物,因为其水平高度依赖于细胞的生长阶段。为了确定TK1在卵巢浆液性腺癌患者中的免疫组化(IHC)表达,并确立其作为疾病进展新生物标志物的潜在作用,我们分析了109例卵巢浆液性腺癌患者中TK1和Ki-67的表达模式。TK1和Ki-67的表达均与MD安德森癌症中心(MDACC)分级呈统计学显著相关,但与年龄、肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移或病理TNM(pTNM)分期无关。TK1表达、MDACC分级、病理分期和淋巴结转移与复发发生率和总生存期相关,但Ki-67不相关。虽然在Cox单因素分析中,TK1表达、MDACC分级、pTNM分期和淋巴结转移与复发显著相关,但在多因素Cox分析中,只有TK1表达和淋巴结转移是独立的预后因素。在Cox单因素分析中,总生存期也与TK1表达、MDACC分级、pTNM分期和淋巴结转移显著相关。然而,在Cox多因素分析中,仅发现pTNM分期是生存的独立预后因素。因此,尽管TK1表达是复发的独立预后因素,但不是生存的独立预后因素,但对于无进展生存期、复发率和总生存率,TK1比Ki-67更具信息性。因此,当TK1与MDACC分级、pTNM分期和淋巴结转移相结合时,IHC检测TK1表达可能会改善卵巢癌患者预后的总体预测。