Zhou Wenhu, Saran Runjhun, Ding Jinsong, Liu Juewen
Department of Chemistry and Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
Chembiochem. 2017 Sep 19;18(18):1828-1835. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201700184. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
Our view of the interaction between Na and nucleic acids was changed by a few recently discovered Na -specific RNA-cleaving DNAzymes. In addition to nonspecific electrostatic interactions, highly specific recognition is also possible. Herein, two such DNAzymes, named EtNa and Ce13d, are compared to elucidate their mechanisms of Na binding. Mutation studies indicate that they have different sequence requirements. Phosphorothioate (PS) substitution at the scissile phosphate drops the activity of EtNa 140-fold, and it cannot be rescued by thiophilic Cd or Mn , whereas the activity of PS-modified Ce13d can be rescued. Na -dependent activity assays indicate that two Na ions bind cooperatively in EtNa, and each Na likely interacts with a nonbridging oxygen atom in the scissile phosphate, whereas Ce13d binds only one Na ion in a well-defined Na aptamer, and this Na ion does not directly interact with the scissile phosphate. Both DNAzymes display a normal pH-rate profile, with a single deprotonation reaction required for catalysis. For EtNa, Na fails to protect the conserved nucleotides from dimethyl sulfate attack, and no specific Na binding is detected by 2-aminopurine fluorescence, both of which are different from those observed for Ce13d. This work suggests that EtNa binds Na mainly through its scissile phosphate without significant involvement of the nucleotides in the enzyme strand, whereas Ce13d has a well-defined aptamer for Na binding. Therefore, DNA has at least two distinct ways to achieve highly selective Na binding.
最近发现的几种钠特异性RNA切割DNA酶改变了我们对钠与核酸之间相互作用的看法。除了非特异性静电相互作用外,高度特异性识别也是可能的。在此,比较了两种这样的DNA酶,即EtNa和Ce13d,以阐明它们与钠结合的机制。突变研究表明它们有不同的序列要求。在切割磷酸处进行硫代磷酸酯(PS)取代使EtNa的活性下降了140倍,并且它不能被亲硫的镉或锰挽救,而PS修饰的Ce13d的活性可以被挽救。钠依赖性活性测定表明,两个钠离子在EtNa中协同结合,并且每个钠可能与切割磷酸中的一个非桥连氧原子相互作用,而Ce13d在一个明确的钠适配体中仅结合一个钠离子,并且这个钠离子不直接与切割磷酸相互作用。两种DNA酶都显示出正常的pH-速率曲线,催化需要单个去质子化反应。对于EtNa,钠不能保护保守核苷酸免受硫酸二甲酯攻击,并且通过2-氨基嘌呤荧光未检测到特异性钠结合,这两者都与Ce13d中观察到的不同。这项工作表明,EtNa主要通过其切割磷酸结合钠,而酶链中的核苷酸没有显著参与,而Ce13d有一个明确的钠结合适配体。因此,DNA至少有两种不同的方式来实现高度选择性的钠结合。