Phuttharak Warinthorn, Boonrod Arunnit, Patjanasoontorn Natnicha, Peansukwech Udomlack, Sawanyawisuth Kittisak
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 Dec;61(6):753-758. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12627. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
Causes of orbital masses can be either benign or malignant. An MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may be helpful to differentiate causes of orbital masses. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic properties of an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in orbital masses.
We retrospectively reviewed patients with orbital masses who underwent DWI and had histopathological results. Orbital lesions were categorized as benign or malignant and compared with respect to the ADC and ADC ratio. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the ADC and ADC ratio threshold.
The mean age of all 42 patients in this study was 36.31 years (S.D. 22.12) and 26 of the patients were male (61.9%). The malignant orbital masses accounted for 43% (18 patients). The most common cell type was meningioma (10 patients; 23.8%). There was no statistical difference between the ADC values of benign and malignant tumours (1.18 vs 0.99 ×10 mm /s; P-value 0.200). The myxoid tumours had significantly higher ADC values than the non-myxoid (1.58 vs 0.99; P-value 0.008) tumours. Non-metastatic non-myxoid tumours also had significantly lower ADC values than metastatic non-myxoid tumours (0.73 vs 1.32; P-values 0.006). The ADC cut-off point of greater than or equal to 0.95 × 10 mm /s was given a sensitivity of 87.50% for myxoid orbital masses, while the cut-off point of greater than or equal to 1.01 × 10 mm /s was given a sensitivity of 80.00% for metastatic, non-myxoid malignant orbital masses.
Benign and malignant orbital masses cannot be distinguished by using the ADC values. However, the ADC values were useful in differentiating between myxoid vs non-myxoid orbital masses and metastatic non-myxoid vs non-metastatic non-myxoid orbital masses.
眼眶肿物的病因可为良性或恶性。带有扩散加权成像(DWI)的磁共振成像(MRI)可能有助于鉴别眼眶肿物的病因。本研究旨在评估表观扩散系数(ADC)在眼眶肿物中的诊断特性。
我们回顾性分析了接受DWI检查且有组织病理学结果的眼眶肿物患者。眼眶病变分为良性或恶性,并就ADC值和ADC比率进行比较。绘制了受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)以评估ADC值和ADC比率阈值的敏感性和特异性。
本研究中42例患者的平均年龄为36.31岁(标准差22.12),其中26例为男性(61.9%)。恶性眼眶肿物占43%(18例患者)。最常见的细胞类型是脑膜瘤(10例患者;23.8%)。良性和恶性肿瘤的ADC值之间无统计学差异(1.18对0.99×10⁻³mm²/s;P值0.200)。黏液样肿瘤的ADC值显著高于非黏液样肿瘤(1.58对0.99;P值0.008)。非转移性非黏液样肿瘤的ADC值也显著低于转移性非黏液样肿瘤(0.73对1.32;P值0.006)。对于黏液样眼眶肿物,ADC截止点大于或等于0.95×10⁻³mm²/s时敏感性为87.50%,而对于转移性非黏液样恶性眼眶肿物,截止点大于或等于1.01×10⁻³mm²/s时敏感性为80.00%。
不能通过ADC值区分良性和恶性眼眶肿物。然而,ADC值有助于区分黏液样与非黏液样眼眶肿物以及转移性非黏液样与非转移性非黏液样眼眶肿物。