Robinson Zachary L, Coombs Jason A, Hudy Mark, Nislow Keith H, Letcher Benjamin H, Whiteley Andrew R
Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Mol Ecol. 2017 Sep;26(17):4418-4433. doi: 10.1111/mec.14225. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
Genetic rescue is an increasingly considered conservation measure to address genetic erosion associated with habitat loss and fragmentation. The resulting gene flow from facilitating migration may improve fitness and adaptive potential, but is not without risks (e.g., outbreeding depression). Here, we conducted a test of genetic rescue by translocating ten (five of each sex) brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) from a single source to four nearby and isolated stream populations. To control for the demographic contribution of translocated individuals, ten resident individuals (five of each sex) were removed from each recipient population. Prior to the introduction of translocated individuals, the two smallest above-barrier populations had substantially lower genetic diversity, and all populations had reduced effective number of breeders relative to adjacent below-barrier populations. In the first reproductive bout following translocation, 31 of 40 (78%) translocated individuals reproduced successfully. Translocated individuals contributed to more families than expected under random mating and generally produced larger full-sibling families. We observed relatively high (>20%) introgression in three of the four recipient populations. The translocations increased genetic diversity of recipient populations by 45% in allelic richness and 25% in expected heterozygosity. Additionally, strong evidence of hybrid vigour was observed through significantly larger body sizes of hybrid offspring relative to resident offspring in all recipient populations. Continued monitoring of these populations will test for negative fitness effects beyond the first generation. However, these results provide much-needed experimental data to inform the potential effectiveness of genetic rescue-motivated translocations.
基因拯救是一种越来越受到重视的保护措施,用于应对与栖息地丧失和破碎化相关的基因侵蚀。促进迁移所带来的基因流动可能会提高适应性和适应潜力,但并非没有风险(例如,远交衰退)。在这里,我们通过将十条(每种性别各五条)溪红点鲑(Salvelinus fontinalis)从单一来源转移到附近四个孤立的溪流种群中,对基因拯救进行了测试。为了控制转移个体的种群统计学贡献,从每个接受种群中移除了十名本地个体(每种性别各五名)。在引入转移个体之前,两个最小的屏障上游种群的遗传多样性显著较低,并且与相邻的屏障下游种群相比,所有种群的有效繁殖个体数量都有所减少。在转移后的第一次繁殖期,40条转移个体中有31条(78%)成功繁殖。转移个体所产生的家系比随机交配预期的更多,并且通常产生更大的全同胞家系。我们在四个接受种群中的三个中观察到了相对较高(>20%)的基因渗入。转移使接受种群的遗传多样性在等位基因丰富度上增加了45%,在预期杂合度上增加了25%。此外,通过在所有接受种群中观察到杂交后代的体型明显大于本地后代,有力地证明了杂种优势。对这些种群的持续监测将测试第一代之后的负面适应性影响。然而,这些结果提供了急需的实验数据,以了解基因拯救驱动的转移的潜在有效性。