Diguisto Caroline, Goffinet François, Lorthe Elsa, Kayem Gilles, Roze Jean-Christophe, Boileau Pascal, Khoshnood Babak, Benhammou Valérie, Langer Bruno, Sentilhes Loic, Subtil Damien, Azria Elie, Kaminski Monique, Ancel Pierre-Yves, Foix-L'Hélias Laurence
Inserm UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (Epopé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Maternité Olympe de Gouges, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire Tours, Tours, France.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Nov;102(6):F476-F482. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312322. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
Survival rates of infants born before 25 weeks of gestation are low in France and have not improved over the past decade. Active perinatal care increases these infants' likelihood of survival.
Our aim was to identify factors associated with active antenatal care, which is the first step of proactive perinatal care in extremely preterm births.
The population included 1020 singleton births between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation enrolled in the Etude Epidémiologique sur les Petits Ages Gestationnels 2 study, a French national population-based cohort of very preterm infants born in 2011. The main outcome was 'active antenatal care' defined as the administration of either corticosteroids or magnesium sulfate or delivery by caesarean section for fetal rescue. A multivariable analysis was performed using a two-level multilevel model taking into account the maternity unit of delivery to estimate the adjusted ORs (aORs) of receiving active antenatal care associated with maternal, obstetric and place of birth characteristics.
Among the population of extremely preterm births, 42% received active antenatal care. After standardisation for gestational age, regional rates of active antenatal care varied between 22% (95% CI 5% to 38%) and 61% (95% CI 44% to 78%). Despite adjustment for individual and organisational characteristics, active antenatal care varied significantly between maternity units (p=0.03). Rates of active antenatal care increased with gestational age with an aOR of 6.46 (95% CI 3.40 to 12.27) and 10.09 (95% CI 5.26 to 19.36) for infants born at 25 and 26 weeks' gestation compared with those born at 24 weeks. No other individual characteristic was associated with active antenatal care.
Even after standardisation for gestational age, active antenatal care in France for extremely preterm births varies widely with place of birth. The dependence of life and death decisions on place of birth raises serious ethical questions.
在法国,妊娠25周前出生的婴儿存活率较低,且在过去十年中并未有所改善。积极的围产期护理可提高这些婴儿的存活可能性。
我们的目标是确定与积极产前护理相关的因素,积极产前护理是极早产中积极围产期护理的第一步。
研究人群包括1020例妊娠22至26周的单胎分娩,这些病例纳入了“小孕周流行病学研究2”,这是一项基于法国全国人口的队列研究,研究对象为2011年出生的极早产婴儿。主要结局是“积极产前护理”,定义为使用糖皮质激素或硫酸镁或为挽救胎儿而行剖宫产。采用两级多水平模型进行多变量分析,考虑分娩的产科单位,以估计与母亲、产科和出生地点特征相关的接受积极产前护理的校正比值比(aORs)。
在极早产人群中,42%接受了积极产前护理。在对孕周进行标准化后,积极产前护理的地区发生率在22%(95%可信区间5%至38%)至61%(95%可信区间44%至78%)之间。尽管对个体和组织特征进行了调整,但各产科单位的积极产前护理差异仍有统计学意义(p=0.03)。积极产前护理的发生率随孕周增加而升高,与妊娠24周出生的婴儿相比,妊娠25周和26周出生的婴儿接受积极产前护理的aOR分别为6.46(95%可信区间3.40至12.27)和10.09(95%可信区间5.26至19.36)。没有其他个体特征与积极产前护理相关。
即使对孕周进行了标准化,法国极早产的积极产前护理在不同出生地点仍存在很大差异。生死决策对出生地点的依赖引发了严重的伦理问题。