VITO NV (Flemish Institute for Technological Research), Mol, Belgium.
Envigo, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Toxicol In Vitro. 2017 Oct;44:122-133. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
Assessment of ocular irritation potential is an international regulatory requirement in the safety evaluation of industrial and consumer products. None in vitro ocular irritation assays are capable of fully categorizing chemicals as stand-alone. Therefore, the CEFIC-LRI-AIMT6-VITO CON4EI consortium assessed the reliability of eight in vitro test methods and computational models as well as established a tiered-testing strategy. One of the selected assays was Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP). In this project, the same corneas were used for measurement of opacity using the OP-KIT, the Laser Light-Based Opacitometer (LLBO) and for histopathological analysis. The results show that the accuracy of the BCOP OP-KIT in identifying Cat 1 chemicals was 73.8% while the accuracy was 86.3% for No Cat chemicals. BCOP OP-KIT false negative results were often related to an in vivo classification driven by conjunctival effects only. For the BCOP LLBO, the accuracy in identifying Cat 1 chemicals was 74.4% versus 88.8% for No Cat chemicals. The BCOP LLBO seems very promising for the identification of No Cat liquids but less so for the identification of solids. Histopathology as an additional endpoint to the BCOP test method does not reduce the false negative rate substantially for in vivo Cat 1 chemicals.
眼刺激性评估是工业和消费品安全评价的国际监管要求。没有一种体外眼刺激性检测方法能够完全将化学品分类为单一类别。因此,CEFIC-LRI-AIMT6-VITO CON4EI 联合体评估了八种体外测试方法和计算模型的可靠性,并建立了分级测试策略。选择的检测方法之一是牛眼角膜混浊和通透性(BCOP)。在本项目中,使用相同的角膜进行 opacity 的测量,使用 OP-KIT、激光光基于Opacity 计(LLBO)和组织病理学分析。结果表明,BCOP OP-KIT 识别 Cat 1 化学品的准确性为 73.8%,而 No Cat 化学品的准确性为 86.3%。BCOP OP-KIT 的假阴性结果通常与仅由结膜效应驱动的体内分类有关。对于 BCOP LLBO,识别 Cat 1 化学品的准确性为 74.4%,而识别 No Cat 化学品的准确性为 88.8%。BCOP LLBO 似乎非常适合识别 No Cat 液体,但对识别固体的效果则不太理想。组织病理学作为 BCOP 测试方法的附加终点并不能显著降低体内 Cat 1 化学品的假阴性率。