Suppr超能文献

通过对石枝藻属(Sporolithon)和海德里希藻属(Heydrichia)(石枝藻目,红藻门)的模式种及其他物种的测序,对这两个属进行了明确。

The coralline genera Sporolithon and Heydrichia (Sporolithales, Rhodophyta) clarified by sequencing type material of their generitypes and other species.

作者信息

Richards Joseph L, Sauvage Thomas, Schmidt William E, Fredericq Suzanne, Hughey Jeffery R, Gabrielson Paul W

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana, 70504-3602, USA.

Smithsonian Marine Station at Fort Pierce, Fort Pierce, Florida, 34949-3140, USA.

出版信息

J Phycol. 2017 Oct;53(5):1044-1059. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12562. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

Abstract

Interspecific systematics in the red algal order Sporolithales remains problematic. To re-evaluate its species, DNA analyses were performed on historical type material and recently collected specimens assigned to the two genera Sporolithon and Heydrichia. Partial rbcL sequences from the lectotype specimens of Sporolithon ptychoides (the generitype species) and Sporolithon molle, both from El Tor, Egypt, are exact matches to field-collected topotype specimens. Sporolithon crassum and Sporolithon erythraeum also have the same type locality; material of the former appears to no longer exist, and we were unable to PCR amplify DNA from the latter. A new species, Sporolithon eltorensis, is described from the same type locality. We have not found any morpho-anatomical characters that distinguish these three species. No sequenced specimens reported as S. ptychoides from other parts of the world represent this species, and likely reports of S. ptychoides and S. molle based on morpho-anatomy are incorrect. A partial rbcL sequence from the holotype of Sporolithon dimotum indicates it is not a synonym of S. ptychoides, and data from the holotype of S. episporum confirm its specific recognition. DNA sequences from topotype material of Heydrichia woelkerlingii, the generitype species, and isotype material of Heydrichia cerasina confirm that these are distinct species; the taxon reported to be H. woelkerlingii from New Zealand is likely an undescribed species. Type specimens of all other Sporolithon and Heydrichia species need to be sequenced to confirm that they are distinct species; morpho-anatomical studies have proved inadequate for this task.

摘要

红藻目石枝藻目中的种间系统分类仍然存在问题。为了重新评估该目的物种,我们对历史模式材料以及最近采集的、归属于石枝藻属(Sporolithon)和海德里希藻属(Heydrichia)的标本进行了DNA分析。来自埃及托尔的石枝藻属模式种细纹石枝藻(Sporolithon ptychoides)和软质石枝藻(Sporolithon molle)的选定模式标本的部分rbcL序列,与野外采集的原产地同型标本完全匹配。粗石枝藻(Sporolithon crassum)和红海石枝藻(Sporolithon erythraeum)也具有相同的模式产地;前者的材料似乎已不复存在,我们无法从后者中PCR扩增出DNA。我们从同一模式产地描述了一个新物种——托尔石枝藻(Sporolithon eltorensis)。我们尚未发现任何能区分这三个物种的形态解剖学特征。世界其他地区报道的被鉴定为细纹石枝藻的测序标本并不代表该物种,基于形态解剖学对细纹石枝藻和软质石枝藻的报道可能是错误的。来自异形石枝藻(Sporolithon dimotum)全模式标本的部分rbcL序列表明它不是细纹石枝藻的异名,来自孢子外石枝藻(Sporolithon episporum)全模式标本的数据证实了它是一个独立的物种。海德里希藻属模式种沃氏海德里希藻(Heydrichia woelkerlingii)的原产地同型标本以及蜡质海德里希藻(Heydrichia cerasina)的等模式标本的DNA序列证实了它们是不同的物种;来自新西兰的被报道为沃氏海德里希藻的分类群可能是一个未描述的物种。所有其他石枝藻属和海德里希藻属物种的模式标本都需要进行测序,以确认它们是不同的物种;形态解剖学研究已证明不足以完成这项任务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验