Platt Jeffrey L, Kaufman Christina L, Garcia de Mattos Barbosa Mayara, Cascalho Marilia
aDepartment of Surgery bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan cChristine M. Kleinert Institute for Hand and Microsurgery, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2017 Oct;22(5):470-476. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000446.
The outcome of vascularized composite allografts (VCA) often appear unrelated to the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in blood of the recipient or deposition of complement in the graft. The attenuation of injury and the absence of rejection in other types of grafts despite manifest donor-specific immunity have been explained by accommodation (acquired resistance to immune-mediated injury), adaptation (loss of graft antigen) and/or enhancement (antibody-mediated antigen blockade). Whether and how accommodation, adaptation and/or enhancement impact on the outcome of VCA is unknown. Here we consider how recent observations concerning accommodation in organ transplants might advance understanding and resolve uncertainties about the clinical course of VCA.
Investigation of the mechanisms through which kidney allografts avert antibody-mediated injury and rejection provide insights potentially applicable to VCA. Interaction of DSA can facilitate replacement of donor by recipient endothelial cells, modulate or decrease synthesis of antigen, mobilize antigen that in turn blocks further immune recognition and limit the amount of bound antibody, allowing accommodation to ensue. These processes also can explain the apparent dissociation between the presence and levels of DSA in blood, deposition of C4d in grafts and antibody-mediated rejection. Over time the processes might also explain the inception of chronic graft changes.
The disrupted tissue in VCA and potential for repopulation by endothelial cells of the recipient establish conditions that potentially decrease susceptibility to acute antibody-mediated rejection. These conditions include clonal suppression of donor-specific B cells, and adaptation, enhancement and accommodation. This setting also potentially highlights heretofore unrecognized interactions between these 'protective' processes.
血管化复合组织异体移植(VCA)的结果似乎常常与受者血液中供者特异性抗体(DSA)的存在或移植物中补体的沉积无关。尽管存在明显的供者特异性免疫,但其他类型移植物中损伤的减轻和排斥反应的缺失已通过适应性调节(对免疫介导损伤的获得性抗性)、适应性变化(移植物抗原的丧失)和/或增强作用(抗体介导的抗原阻断)来解释。适应性调节、适应性变化和/或增强作用是否以及如何影响VCA的结果尚不清楚。在此,我们探讨关于器官移植中适应性调节的最新观察结果如何促进对VCA临床过程的理解并解决相关不确定性。
对肾移植避免抗体介导损伤和排斥反应机制的研究为可能适用于VCA的见解提供了依据。DSA的相互作用可促进受者内皮细胞取代供者内皮细胞,调节或减少抗原合成,动员抗原,进而阻断进一步的免疫识别并限制结合抗体的量,从而实现适应性调节。这些过程也可以解释血液中DSA的存在与水平、移植物中C4d的沉积以及抗体介导的排斥反应之间明显的分离。随着时间的推移,这些过程也可能解释慢性移植物变化的起始。
VCA中受损的组织以及受者内皮细胞重新填充的可能性创造了条件,可能降低对急性抗体介导排斥反应的易感性。这些条件包括供者特异性B细胞的克隆抑制,以及适应性变化、增强作用和适应性调节。这种情况还可能突出这些“保护”过程之间迄今未被认识的相互作用。