Belovezhdov N, Nachev Ch, Angelova I, Gergova V, Stefanov G
Vutr Boles. 1985;24(5):74-7.
The antihypertensive effect of the preparation celiprolol was studied in a double blind experiment versus acebutolol in 60 patients (30 males and 30 females), with an average age 40 years. Only patients with hypertonic diseases, stage I-II, according to WHO classification were included in the study. The treatment Lasted 4 weeks. The criteria for a good effect were the normalization of the blood pressure and the absence of adverse effects. There was no statistically significant difference between the percentages of the reduced blood pressure, attained by both preparations. By the end of 4th week, 56.7 per cent of the treated with celiprolol were with normalized blood pressure, and 46,7 per cent--with acebutolol. The following adverse effects were observed: light gastrointestinal manifestations, weakness, dizziness, tremor, impotence. In some of the patients those effects were transitory but in 4 patients, treated with acebutolol, the treatment was discontinued because of the adverse effects.
在一项双盲实验中,对60名平均年龄40岁(30名男性和30名女性)的患者研究了塞利洛尔制剂与醋丁洛尔相比的降压效果。该研究仅纳入了根据世界卫生组织分类为I-II期高血压疾病的患者。治疗持续4周。治疗效果良好的标准是血压正常且无不良反应。两种制剂降低血压的百分比之间无统计学显著差异。到第4周结束时,接受塞利洛尔治疗的患者中有56.7%血压恢复正常,接受醋丁洛尔治疗的患者中有46.7%血压恢复正常。观察到以下不良反应:轻度胃肠道症状、虚弱、头晕、震颤、阳痿。在一些患者中,这些症状是暂时的,但在4名接受醋丁洛尔治疗的患者中,由于不良反应而停止了治疗。