Genzen Jonathan R, Mohlman Jeffrey S, Lynch Jerry L, Squires Michael W, Weiss Ronald L
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT;
ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT.
Clin Chem. 2017 Oct;63(10):1575-1584. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.275164. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
Twenty-five years ago, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asserted in a draft document that "home brew" tests-now commonly referred to as laboratory-developed tests (LDTs)-are subject to the same regulatory oversight as other in vitro diagnostics (IVDs). In 2010, the FDA began work on developing a proposed framework for future LDT oversight. Released in 2014, the draft guidance sparked an intense debate over potential LDT regulation. While the proposed guidance has not been implemented, many questions regarding LDT oversight remain unresolved.
This review provides an overview of federal statutes and regulations related to IVDs and clinical laboratory operations, with a focus on those potentially applicable to LDTs and proposed regulatory efforts. Sources reviewed include the Code of Federal Regulations, the Federal Register, congressional hearings, guidance and policy documents, position statements, published literature, and websites.
Federal statutes regarding IVDs were passed without substantive evidence of congressional consideration toward the concept of LDTs. The FDA has clear oversight authority over IVD reagents introduced into interstate commerce. A 16-year delay in publicly asserting FDA authority over LDTs, the pursuit of a draft guidance approach toward oversight, and establishment of regulations under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA'88) applicable to LDTs contributed to community uncertainty toward LDT oversight. Future regulatory and/or legislative efforts may be required to resolve this uncertainty.
25年前,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)在一份文件草案中宣称,“自制”检测——现在通常称为实验室自建检测(LDTs)——与其他体外诊断试剂(IVDs)受到相同的监管。2010年,FDA开始着手制定未来LDT监管的拟议框架。2014年发布的草案指南引发了关于潜在LDT监管的激烈辩论。虽然拟议指南尚未实施,但许多关于LDT监管的问题仍未得到解决。
本综述概述了与IVDs和临床实验室操作相关的联邦法规,重点关注那些可能适用于LDTs的法规以及拟议的监管措施。所查阅的资料来源包括《联邦法规汇编》、《联邦公报》、国会听证会、指南和政策文件、立场声明、已发表的文献以及网站。
关于IVDs的联邦法规在没有国会对LDT概念进行实质性审议证据的情况下获得通过。FDA对引入州际商业的IVD试剂拥有明确的监管权。FDA在公开宣称对LDTs的监管权方面延迟了16年,采用拟议指南方法进行监管,并根据1988年《临床实验室改进修正案》(CLIA'88)制定适用于LDTs的法规,这些都导致了业界对LDT监管的不确定性。未来可能需要进行监管和/或立法努力来解决这种不确定性。