Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):738-744. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
There are limited comparative survival data for prostate cancer (PCa) patients managed with a low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-B) boost and dose-escalated external-beam radiotherapy (DE-EBRT) alone.
To compare overall survival (OS) for men with unfavorable PCa between LDR-B and DE-EBRT groups.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the National Cancer Data Base, we identified men with unfavorable PCa treated between 2004 and 2012 with androgen suppression (AS) and either EBRT followed by LDR-B or DE-EBRT (75.6-86.4Gy).
Treatment selection was evaluated using logistic regression and annual percentage proportions. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards, and propensity score matching.
We identified 25038 men between 2004 and 2012, during which LDR-B boost utilization decreased from 29% to 14%. LDR-B was associated with better OS on univariate (7-yr OS: 82% vs 73%; p<0.001) and multivariate analyses (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.77). Propensity score matching verified an OS benefit associated with LDR-B boost (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.89). The OS benefit of LDR-B boost persisted when limited to men aged <60 yr with no comorbidities. On subset analysis, there was no interaction between treatment and age, risk group, or radiation dose. Limitations include the retrospective design, nonrandomized selection bias, and the absence of treatment toxicity, hormone duration, and cancer-specific outcomes.
Between 2004 and 2012, LDR-B boost utilization declined and was associated with better OS compared to DE-EBRT alone. LDR-B boost is probably the ideal treatment option for men with unfavorable PCa, pending long-term results of randomized trials.
We compared radiotherapy utilization and survival for prostate cancer (PCa) patients using a national database. We found that low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-B) boost, a method being used less frequently, was associated with better overall survival when compared to dose-escalated external-beam radiotherapy alone for men with unfavorable PCa. Randomized trials are needed to confirm that LDR-B boost is the ideal treatment.
对于接受低剂量率近距离放射治疗(LDR-B)加量和单纯大剂量外照射放射治疗(DE-EBRT)治疗的前列腺癌(PCa)患者,生存数据的比较有限。
比较 LDR-B 与 DE-EBRT 组中具有不利 PCa 特征的男性的总生存(OS)。
设计、设置和参与者:使用国家癌症数据库,我们确定了 2004 年至 2012 年间接受雄激素抑制(AS)治疗的具有不利 PCa 特征的男性,他们接受了 EBRT 加 LDR-B 或 DE-EBRT(75.6-86.4Gy)。
使用逻辑回归和年度百分比比例评估治疗选择。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法、对数秩检验、Cox 比例风险和倾向评分匹配分析 OS。
我们确定了 2004 年至 2012 年间的 25038 名男性,在此期间,LDR-B 加量的使用率从 29%下降到 14%。LDR-B 在单变量(7 年 OS:82%比 73%;p<0.001)和多变量分析(风险比 [HR] 0.70,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.64-0.77)中与更好的 OS 相关。倾向评分匹配证实了 LDR-B 加量与 OS 获益相关(HR 0.74,95% CI 0.66-0.89)。当仅将年龄<60 岁且无合并症的男性作为亚组分析时,LDR-B 加量的 OS 获益仍然存在。在亚组分析中,治疗与年龄、风险组或辐射剂量之间没有相互作用。局限性包括回顾性设计、非随机选择偏倚以及缺乏治疗毒性、激素持续时间和癌症特异性结局。
2004 年至 2012 年间,LDR-B 加量的使用率下降,与单独使用 DE-EBRT 相比,LDR-B 加量与更好的 OS 相关。LDR-B 加量可能是具有不利 PCa 特征的男性的理想治疗选择,等待随机试验的长期结果。
我们使用国家数据库比较了前列腺癌(PCa)患者的放疗利用和生存情况。我们发现,与单独使用大剂量外照射放射治疗相比,低剂量率近距离放射治疗(LDR-B)加量的方法的应用频率较低,但对于具有不利 PCa 特征的男性,与单纯大剂量外照射放射治疗相比,LDR-B 加量与更好的总生存率相关。需要进行随机试验来证实 LDR-B 加量是否是理想的治疗方法。