Omonode Rex A, Halvorson Ardell D, Gagnon Bernard, Vyn Tony J
Department of Agronomy, Purdue UniversityWest Lafayette, IN, United States.
United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS)Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 23;8:1080. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01080. eCollection 2017.
Few studies have assessed the common, yet unproven, hypothesis that an increase of plant nitrogen (N) uptake and/or recovery efficiency (NRE) will reduce nitrous oxide (NO) emission during crop production. Understanding the relationships between NO emissions and crop N uptake and use efficiency parameters can help inform crop N management recommendations for both efficiency and environmental goals. Analyses were conducted to determine which of several commonly used crop N uptake-derived parameters related most strongly to growing season NO emissions under varying N management practices in North American maize systems. Nitrogen uptake-derived variables included total aboveground N uptake (TNU), grain N uptake (GNU), N recovery efficiency (NRE), net N balance (NNB) in relation to GNU [NNB] and TNU [NNB], and surplus N (SN). The relationship between NO and N application rate was sigmoidal with relatively small emissions for N rates <130 kg ha, and a sharp increase for N rates from 130 to 220 kg ha; on average, NO increased linearly by about 5 g N per kg of N applied for rates up to 220 kg ha. Fairly strong and significant negative relationships existed between NO and NRE when management focused on N application rate ( = 0.52) or rate and timing combinations ( = 0.65). For every percentage point increase, NO decreased by 13 g N ha in response to N rates, and by 20 g N ha for NRE changes in response to rate-by-timing treatments. However, more consistent positive relationships ( = 0.73-0.77) existed between NO and NNB, NNB, and SN, regardless of rate and timing of N application; on average NO emission increased by about 5, 7, and 8 g N, respectively, per kg increase of NNB, NNB, and SN. Neither N source nor placement influenced the relationship between NO and NRE. Overall, our analysis indicated that a careful selection of appropriate N rate applied at the right time can both increase NRE and reduce NO. However, NO reduction benefits of optimum N rate-by-timing practices were achieved most consistently with management systems that reduced NNB through an increase of grain N removal or total plant N uptake relative to the total fertilizer N applied to maize. Future research assessing crop or N management effects on NO should include N uptake parameter measurements to better understand NO emission relationships to plant NRE and N uptake.
很少有研究评估这样一个常见但未经证实的假设,即增加植物氮(N)吸收量和/或回收效率(NRE)会减少作物生产过程中的一氧化二氮(N₂O)排放。了解N₂O排放与作物氮吸收和利用效率参数之间的关系,有助于为实现效率和环境目标提供作物氮管理建议。本研究进行了分析,以确定在北美玉米系统中不同的氮管理措施下,几个常用的基于作物氮吸收的参数中,哪一个与生长季N₂O排放的相关性最强。基于氮吸收的变量包括地上部总吸氮量(TNU)、籽粒吸氮量(GNU)、氮回收效率(NRE)、相对于GNU [NNB] 和TNU [NNB] 的净氮平衡(NNB)以及盈余氮(SN)。N₂O与施氮量之间的关系呈S形,施氮量<130 kg/ha时排放相对较少,施氮量从130增至220 kg/ha时排放急剧增加;平均而言,施氮量达到220 kg/ha之前,每施入1 kg氮,N₂O排放量约线性增加5 g氮。当管理措施侧重于施氮量(r = 0.52)或施氮量与施肥时间组合(r = 0.65)时,N₂O与NRE之间存在相当强且显著的负相关关系。对于施氮量处理,NRE每增加1个百分点,N₂O排放量减少13 g/ha;对于施氮量与施肥时间组合处理,NRE每变化1个百分点,N₂O排放量减少20 g/ha。然而,无论施氮量和施肥时间如何,N₂O与NNB、NNB和SN之间存在更一致的正相关关系(r = 0.73 - 0.77);平均而言,NNB、NNB和SN每增加1 kg,N₂O排放量分别增加约5、7和8 g氮。氮源和施肥位置均不影响N₂O与NRE之间的关系。总体而言,我们的分析表明,在合适的时间仔细选择合适的施氮量,既能提高NRE又能减少N₂O排放。然而,通过增加籽粒氮移除量或相对于施用于玉米的总肥料氮的植株总吸氮量来降低NNB的管理系统,最能始终如一地实现最佳施氮量与施肥时间组合措施减少N₂O排放的效益。未来评估作物或氮管理对N₂O影响的研究应包括氮吸收参数测量,以更好地了解N₂O排放与植物NRE和氮吸收之间的关系。