Nguyen Tram, Hess Søren, Petersen Henrik, Alavi Abass, Høilund-Carlsen Poul Flemming
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Hell J Nucl Med. 2017 May-Aug;20(2):113-121. doi: 10.1967/s002449910551. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
We investigated maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and cut-off values for differentiation of malignant and benign lesions in colorectal cancer (CC) as multiple studies have questioned their validity. We also investigated more extended indices using common semi-quantification analysis in incidental colorectal findings (ICF).
Fluorine-18-fluoro deoxy glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in 25 patients with a total of 30 focal ICF was retrospectively analysed using dedicated software. Method variability was tested through application of three common threshold-based lesion delineation techniques as well as a partial-volume correction (PVC). Lesion SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolically active volume (MAV) and mean total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were thereby extracted along with PVC corrected values (cSUVmean, cTLG) and SUVpeak.
In all lesions, SUVmax was >5 and SUVmean≥2.7. Malignant SUVmax values (mean±SD: 16.5±6.2) were overall significantly higher than benign levels (9.8±3.6). There was a substantial overlap with values in polyps/adenomas (14.4±7.7). Both SUVpeak and SUVmean showed similar characteristics. Malignant MAV and TLG showed more distinct levels. Though different segmentation methods introduced variations, largest in MAV (-58.6%-141.5%), and PVC generally increased measures significantly by a factor of 1.2-2.7, neither changed relative levels much. SUVmax values were inadequate for aetiological differentiation of ICF, which also precludes a clinically significant cut-off value. The same applies to SUVpeak and SUVmean while TLG measures may be more indicative.
Semi-quantitative measurements of SUVmax and cut-off values proved inadequate for differentiating colorectal malignancies from benign findings. While integrated measures, e.g. cTLG, are potentially better indicators of disease severity and extent, more optimal segmentation and PVC methods are required.
由于多项研究对最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)及用于鉴别结直肠癌(CC)恶性和良性病变的临界值的有效性提出质疑,我们对其进行了研究。我们还在偶然发现的结直肠病变(ICF)中使用常见的半定量分析方法研究了更广泛的指标。
使用专用软件对25例患者共30个局灶性ICF的氟-18-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描进行回顾性分析。通过应用三种常见的基于阈值的病变勾画技术以及部分容积校正(PVC)来测试方法的变异性。由此提取病变的SUVmax、SUVmean、代谢活性体积(MAV)和平均总病变糖酵解(TLG)以及PVC校正值(cSUVmean、cTLG)和SUVpeak。
在所有病变中،SUVmax>5且SUVmean≥2.7。恶性病变的SUVmax值(均值±标准差:16.5±6.2)总体上显著高于良性病变水平(9.8±3.6)。与息肉/腺瘤的值(14.4±7.7)有很大重叠。SUVpeak和SUVmean均显示出相似的特征。恶性MAV和TLG显示出更明显的水平。尽管不同的分割方法引入了变化,MAV的变化最大(-58.6%-141.5%),并且PVC通常使测量值显著增加1.2-2.7倍,但两者都没有太大改变相对水平。SUVmax值不足以对ICF进行病因学鉴别,这也排除了具有临床意义的临界值。SUVpeak和SUVmean也是如此,而TLG测量可能更具指示性。
SUVmax的半定量测量和临界值被证明不足以区分结直肠恶性肿瘤与良性病变。虽然综合测量,如cTLG,可能是疾病严重程度和范围的更好指标,但需要更优化的分割和PVC方法。