Suppr超能文献

两种血红蛋白变异体Hb D-伊朗型和Hb E在Hb A2洗脱窗口的特征比较。

Comparison of the characteristics of two hemoglobin variants, Hb D-Iran and Hb E, eluting in the Hb A2 window.

作者信息

Dass Jasmita, Gupta Aastha, Mittal Suchi, Saraf Amrita, Langer Sabina, Bhargava Manorama

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Blood Res. 2017 Jun;52(2):130-134. doi: 10.5045/br.2017.52.2.130. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cation exchange-high performance liquid chromatography (CE-HPLC) is most commonly used to evaluate hemoglobin (Hb) variants, which elute in the Hb A2 window. This study aimed to assess prevalence of an uncommon Hb variant, Hb D-Iran, and compare its red cell parameters and peak characteristics with those of Hb E that commonly elutes in the Hb A2 window.

METHODS

Generally, we assess abnormal Hb using CE-HPLC as the primary technique along with alkaline and acid electrophoresis. All cases with Hb A2 window >9%, as assessed by CE-HPLCs during 2009-2013, were selected.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cases with Hb D-Iran variant were identified-25 heterozygous, 2 homozygous, 1 compound heterozygous Hb D-Iran/β-thalassemia, and 1 Hb D-Iran/Hb D-Punjab. Overall prevalence of Hb D-Iran was 0.23%. Compared to patients with Hb E, those with Hb D-Iran had significantly higher Hb (12.1 vs. 11.3 g/dL, =0.03), MCV (82.4 vs. 76.4 fL, =0.0044), MCH (27.9 vs. 25.45 pg, P =0.0006), and MCHC (33.9 vs. 33.3 g/dL, =0.0005). Amount of abnormal Hb (40.7 vs. 26.4%, =0.0001) was significantly higher while retention time (3.56 vs. 3.70 min, =0.0001) was significantly lower in Hb D-Iran than in Hb E.

CONCLUSION

Hb D-Iran peak can be easily missed if area and retention time of the Hb A2 window are not carefully analyzed. To distinguish between variants, careful analysis of peak area and retention time is sufficient in most cases and may be further confirmed by the second technique-alkaline electrophoresis.

摘要

背景

阳离子交换高效液相色谱法(CE-HPLC)最常用于评估血红蛋白(Hb)变异体,这些变异体在Hb A2区域洗脱。本研究旨在评估一种罕见的Hb变异体——Hb D-伊朗型的流行情况,并将其红细胞参数和峰特征与通常在Hb A2区域洗脱的Hb E的参数和特征进行比较。

方法

一般来说,我们以CE-HPLC作为主要技术,同时结合碱性和酸性电泳来评估异常血红蛋白。选取了2009年至2013年期间通过CE-HPLC评估Hb A2区域>9%的所有病例。

结果

共鉴定出29例Hb D-伊朗型变异体病例——25例杂合子、2例纯合子、1例Hb D-伊朗型/β地中海贫血复合杂合子和1例Hb D-伊朗型/Hb D-旁遮普型。Hb D-伊朗型的总体流行率为0.23%。与Hb E患者相比,Hb D-伊朗型患者的血红蛋白水平显著更高(12.1对11.3 g/dL,P =0.03)、平均红细胞体积(82.4对76.4 fL,P =0.0044)、平均红细胞血红蛋白含量(27.9对25.45 pg,P =0.0006)和平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度(33.9对33.3 g/dL,P =0.0005)。Hb D-伊朗型的异常血红蛋白量(40.7对26.4%,P =0.0001)显著更高,而保留时间(3.56对3.70分钟,P =0.0001)显著低于Hb E。

结论

如果不仔细分析Hb A2区域的面积和保留时间,Hb D-伊朗型峰很容易被遗漏。为区分变异体,在大多数情况下仔细分析峰面积和保留时间就足够了,并且可以通过第二种技术——碱性电泳进一步确认。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验