Boatin Adeline Adwoa, Adu-Bonsaffoh Kwame, Wylie Blair Johnson, Obed Samuel A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Founders 5, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Sep;21(9):1845-1852. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2302-3.
Objective To describe facility-based decision-making for women with one prior cesarean delivery (CD) in a resource-limited setting and to characterize maternal and perinatal outcomes in these groups. Methods One year retrospective study of women with one prior CD delivering at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), Ghana. Women were categorized into three groups based on initial plan of management on admission [trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), emergency repeat CD (EMCD) or non-emergent repeat CD (RCD)]. Characteristics and outcomes across these groups were then compared. Results During the study period, 1247 women with one prior CD delivered at KBTH, of which 377 (30.2%) were triaged to RCD, 439 (35.2%) to EMCD and 431 (34.6%) to TOLAC. Twelve uterine ruptures and no maternal deaths occurred. Perinatal mortality was 4.2% (n = 52). Compared to the RCD group, the TOLAC group had a lower risk for maternal adverse events (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-1.0; p = 0.04) and non-significant higher risk of perinatal adverse events (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.3; p = 0.25). Compared to women triaged to RCD, the EMCD group had a non-significant increase in risk of maternal adverse events (aOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8-3.5; p = 0.2) and a significantly higher rate of perinatal adverse events (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.9; p = 0.01). Conclusions for Practice Women triaged to EMCD at admission are different when compared to women allowed a TOLAC or offered a non-emergent RCD. These women bear increased rates of adverse outcomes and should be considered as a separate group for analysis in future studies conducted in similar settings.
目的 描述在资源有限的环境中,针对有过一次剖宫产史的女性基于医疗机构的决策制定情况,并描述这些群体的孕产妇和围产期结局。方法 对在加纳科勒-布教学医院(KBTH)分娩的有过一次剖宫产史的女性进行为期一年的回顾性研究。根据入院时的初始管理计划,将女性分为三组[剖宫产术后试产(TOLAC)、急诊再次剖宫产(EMCD)或非急诊再次剖宫产(RCD)]。然后比较这些组的特征和结局。结果 在研究期间,1247名有过一次剖宫产史的女性在KBTH分娩,其中377名(30.2%)被分诊至RCD,439名(35.2%)至EMCD,431名(34.6%)至TOLAC。发生了12例子宫破裂,无孕产妇死亡。围产期死亡率为4.2%(n = 52)。与RCD组相比,TOLAC组孕产妇不良事件风险较低(调整后比值比0.3,95%可信区间0.1 - 1.0;p = 0.04),围产期不良事件风险无显著升高(调整后比值比1.6,95%可信区间0.7 - 3.3;p = 0.25)。与分诊至RCD的女性相比,EMCD组孕产妇不良事件风险无显著增加(调整后比值比1.6,95%可信区间0.8 - 3.5;p = 0.2),围产期不良事件发生率显著更高(调整后比值比2.4,95%可信区间1.2 - 4.9;p = 0.01)。实践结论 与允许进行TOLAC或接受非急诊RCD的女性相比,入院时被分诊至EMCD的女性有所不同。这些女性不良结局发生率较高,在未来类似环境下进行的研究中,应将她们视为一个单独的分析群体。