Yamamoto Kazuhiro
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
Yonago Acta Med. 2017 Jun 26;60(2):71-76. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a socioeconomic burden in Japan as well as other developed countries. Diuretics are widely used to attenuate symptoms and signs of congestion in both heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction, although their effects on long-term prognosis of both phenotypes of heart failure have not been demonstrated because of an ethical difficulty in designing a randomized and prospective clinical trial. Guidelines do not provide any guidance on therapy choice, and physicians blindly choose furosemide among loop diuretics in current clinical settings. However, several clinical studies have suggested that the effects of loop diuretics are not consistent, and that furosemide is not necessarily preferable as compared with other loop diuretics. We should pay attention to the choice of loop diuretics. Regarding the improvement of long-term prognosis, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor blocker and β-blocker are proven effective for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, none of these drugs have improved prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in clinical trials. Observational studies and subanalysis of clinical trials suggest the benefits of these drugs in this phenotype of heart failure. All of clinical trials and observational studies present facts to us, and let us recognize that "one size fits all approach" may be a cause for a lack of evidence about the therapeutic strategy of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction until now. We have to make efforts to clarify characteristics of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction to whom the administration of each drug provides benefits or do not.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭在日本以及其他发达国家都是一项社会经济负担。利尿剂被广泛用于减轻射血分数保留和降低的心力衰竭患者的充血症状和体征,尽管由于设计随机前瞻性临床试验存在伦理困难,其对这两种心力衰竭表型长期预后的影响尚未得到证实。指南并未就治疗选择提供任何指导,在当前临床环境中,医生在袢利尿剂中盲目选择呋塞米。然而,多项临床研究表明,袢利尿剂的效果并不一致,与其他袢利尿剂相比,呋塞米不一定更具优势。我们应关注袢利尿剂的选择。关于改善长期预后,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、盐皮质激素受体阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂已被证明对射血分数降低的心衰有效。然而,在临床试验中,这些药物均未改善射血分数保留的心衰的预后。观察性研究和临床试验的亚组分析提示这些药物对这种心力衰竭表型有益。所有的临床试验和观察性研究都向我们呈现了事实,让我们认识到“一刀切”的方法可能是迄今为止射血分数保留的心衰治疗策略缺乏证据的一个原因。我们必须努力阐明每种药物给药有益或无益的射血分数保留的心衰患者的特征。