Detter Christian, Russ Detlef, Kersten Jan Felix, Reichenspurner Hermann, Wipper Sabine
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Institut für Lasertechnologien in der Medizin und Messtechnik, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Feb;34(2):159-167. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1212-1. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
Intraoperative graft assessment in coronary artery bypass (CAB) grafting is important to avoid early graft failure. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of fluorescent cardiac imaging (FCI) for intraoperative qualitative angiographic and quantitative myocardial perfusion assessment during graded CAB stenosis compared to coronary angiography (CA). After CAB grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery, graded distal bypass stenoses were created in ten pigs by 25, 50, 75, and 100% flow reduction assessed by transit-time flow measurement (TTFM). Visual angiographic assessment was performed by FCI and CA during baseline and graded bypass stenoses. Altered myocardial perfusion was assessed by quantitative intraoperative fluorescence intensity (QIFI) derived from FCI and correlated to TTFM. Patent bypass grafts and graft occlusion were visualized successfully by FCI and CA, while discrimination between various graded bypass stenosis was possible in 73.3%. The degree of CAB stenosis was overestimated in 16.7% and underestimated in 10.0% by FCI compared to CA. Graded CAB stenosis reduced regional myocardial perfusion quantified by decreased QIFI value (p < 0.001). Mean QIFI value was 76.8 (95% CI 67.2-86.3) during baseline, 55.6 (95% CI 45.3-65.9) during 25% flow-reduction, 30.6 (95% CI 22.3-39.0) during 50% flow-reduction, 20.3 (95% CI 15.4-25.3) during 75% flow-reduction, and 0 during CAB occlusion (p < 0.001) with a significant correlation to TTFM (r = 0.955; p < 0.0001). Solely visual assessment of CAB quality using FCI is limited as compared to CA. Additional QIFI assessment identified graded CAB stenosis and occlusion with a significant correlation to TTFM.
冠状动脉搭桥术(CAB)中进行术中移植物评估对于避免早期移植物失败至关重要。本研究旨在评估荧光心脏成像(FCI)与冠状动脉造影(CA)相比,在分级CAB狭窄期间进行术中定性血管造影和定量心肌灌注评估的准确性。在将CAB移植物植入左前降支冠状动脉后,通过经渡时间流量测量(TTFM)评估,在十只猪中造成分级的远端搭桥狭窄,流量减少25%、50%、75%和100%。在基线和分级搭桥狭窄期间,通过FCI和CA进行视觉血管造影评估。通过从FCI得出的术中定量荧光强度(QIFI)评估心肌灌注改变,并将其与TTFM相关联。FCI和CA成功显示了通畅的搭桥移植物和移植物闭塞情况,而在73.3%的情况下能够区分不同分级的搭桥狭窄。与CA相比,FCI对CAB狭窄程度的高估为16.7%,低估为10.0%。分级的CAB狭窄通过QIFI值降低使区域心肌灌注减少(p < 0.001)。基线时平均QIFI值为76.8(95%可信区间67.2 - 86.3),流量减少25%时为55.6(95%可信区间45.3 - 65.9),流量减少50%时为30.6(95%可信区间22.3 - 39.0),流量减少75%时为20.3(95%可信区间15.4 - 25.3),CAB闭塞时为0(p < 0.001),且与TTFM有显著相关性(r = 0.955;p < 0.0001)。与CA相比,仅使用FCI对CAB质量进行视觉评估存在局限性。额外的QIFI评估可识别分级的CAB狭窄和闭塞,且与TTFM有显著相关性。