University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, 7007 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Jul 18;5(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0260-3.
Immunotherapies have demonstrated clinical benefit for many types of cancers, however many patients do not respond, and treatment-related adverse effects can be severe. Hence many efforts are underway to identify treatment predictive biomarkers. We have reported the results of two phase I trials using a DNA vaccine encoding prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. In both trials, persistent PAP-specific Th1 immunity developed in some patients, and this was associated with favorable changes in serum PSA kinetics. In the current study, we sought to determine if measures of antigen-specific or antigen non-specific immunity were present prior to treatment, and associated with subsequent immune response, to identify possible predictive immune biomarkers.
Patients who developed persistent PAP-specific, IFNγ-secreting immune responses were defined as immune "responders." The frequency of peripheral T cell and B cell lymphocytes, natural killer cells, monocytes, dendritic cells, myeloid derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells were assessed by flow cytometry and clinical laboratory values. PAP-specific immune responses were evaluated by cytokine secretion in vitro, and by antigen-specific suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity to a recall antigen in an in vivo SCID mouse model.
The frequency of peripheral blood cell types did not differ between the immune responder and non-responder groups. Non-responder patients tended to have higher PAP-specific IL-10 production pre-vaccination (p = 0.09). Responder patients had greater preexisting PAP-specific bystander regulatory responses that suppressed DTH to a recall antigen (p = 0.016).
While our study population was small (n = 38), these results suggest that different measures of antigen-specific tolerance or regulation might help predict immunological outcome from DNA vaccination. These will be prospectively evaluated in an ongoing randomized, phase II trial.
免疫疗法已显示出对多种癌症的临床益处,但许多患者没有反应,且治疗相关的不良反应可能很严重。因此,许多人正在努力寻找治疗预测生物标志物。我们已经报告了两项使用编码前列腺酸性磷酸酶(PAP)的 DNA 疫苗治疗生化复发前列腺癌患者的 I 期临床试验结果。在这两项试验中,一些患者产生了持续的 PAP 特异性 Th1 免疫反应,这与血清 PSA 动力学的有利变化相关。在当前的研究中,我们试图确定在治疗前是否存在针对抗原特异性或非抗原特异性免疫的测量,并且与随后的免疫反应相关,以确定可能的预测性免疫生物标志物。
将产生持续的 PAP 特异性、IFNγ 分泌免疫反应的患者定义为免疫“应答者”。通过流式细胞术和临床实验室值评估外周 T 细胞和 B 细胞淋巴细胞、自然杀伤细胞、单核细胞、树突状细胞、髓系来源的抑制细胞和调节性 T 细胞的频率。通过体外细胞因子分泌和在 SCID 小鼠模型中抗原特异性抑制迟发型超敏反应来评估 PAP 特异性免疫反应。
免疫应答者和无应答者组之间外周血细胞类型的频率没有差异。无应答者患者在接种疫苗前倾向于产生更高的 PAP 特异性 IL-10 产生(p=0.09)。应答者患者具有更大的预先存在的 PAP 特异性旁观者调节反应,抑制对回忆抗原的迟发型超敏反应(p=0.016)。
尽管我们的研究人群较小(n=38),但这些结果表明,针对抗原特异性耐受或调节的不同测量可能有助于预测 DNA 疫苗接种的免疫结果。这些将在正在进行的随机、II 期试验中进行前瞻性评估。