Resnick Cory M, Vakilian Pouya M, Kaban Leonard B, Peacock Zachary S
Attending Surgeon, Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital; Instructor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA.
DMD Candidate, Harvard School of Dental Medicine; Research Assistant, Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;75(4):694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.045. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
To compare short-term outcomes and procedure times for intra-articular steroid injection (IASI) to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with and without the use of intraoperative image guidance for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
This is a retrospective study of children with JIA who underwent TMJ IASI at Boston Children's Hospital (Boston, MA). Patients were divided into groups according to IASI technique: 1) "landmark" group if performed by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon using an anatomic landmark technique with no intraoperative image guidance or 2) "image-guided" group if performed by an interventional radiologist using intraoperative ultrasound and computed tomography. Predictor variables included IASI technique (landmark vs image guided), age, gender, JIA subtype, category of medications for arthritis, and presence of family history of autoimmune disease. Outcome variables were changes in patient-reported pain, maximal incisal opening (MIO), synovial enhancement ratio (ER), and total procedure time.
Forty-five patients with 71 injected TMJs were included. Twenty-two patients with 36 injected TMJs were in the landmark group and 23 patients with 35 injected joints were in the image-guided group. There were no relevant differences in age, gender, family history of rheumatologic disease, or disease subtype between groups. There were no differences in resolution of pain (P = 1.00), increase in MIO (P = .975), or decrease in ER (P = .492) between groups, but procedure times averaged 49 minutes longer for the image-guided group (P < .008).
There were no statistical differences in short-term outcomes, but procedure times were longer for the image-guided group. Although specific indications for the use of image guidance might exist, routine use of this procedure cannot be justified.
比较在有或没有术中影像引导的情况下,对青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)患者进行颞下颌关节(TMJ)关节内类固醇注射(IASI)的短期疗效和操作时间。
这是一项对在波士顿儿童医院(马萨诸塞州波士顿)接受TMJ IASI的JIA患儿的回顾性研究。根据IASI技术将患者分为两组:1)“地标”组,由口腔颌面外科医生采用解剖地标技术进行,无术中影像引导;2)“影像引导”组,由介入放射科医生使用术中超声和计算机断层扫描进行。预测变量包括IASI技术(地标引导与影像引导)、年龄、性别、JIA亚型、关节炎药物类别以及自身免疫性疾病家族史。疗效变量包括患者报告的疼痛变化、最大切牙开口度(MIO)、滑膜强化率(ER)和总操作时间。
纳入45例患者,共71个注射TMJ。“地标”组有22例患者,36个注射TMJ;“影像引导”组有23例患者,35个注射关节。两组在年龄、性别、风湿性疾病家族史或疾病亚型方面无相关差异。两组在疼痛缓解(P = 1.00)、MIO增加(P = 0.975)或ER降低(P = 0.492)方面无差异,但“影像引导”组的操作时间平均长49分钟(P < 0.008)。
短期疗效无统计学差异,但“影像引导”组的操作时间更长。虽然可能存在使用影像引导的特定指征,但该操作的常规使用尚无正当理由。