• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Table Saw Injuries: Are Our Safety Features Really Keeping Us Safe?台锯伤害:我们的安全装置真的能保障我们的安全吗?
Hand (N Y). 2018 Mar;13(2):181-183. doi: 10.1177/1558944717695754. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Table saw injuries: epidemiology and a proposal for preventive measures.台锯伤:流行病学和预防措施建议。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):777e-783e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3bfb1.
3
Weekend woodsmen: Overview and comparison of injury patterns associated with power saw and axe utilization in the United States.周末伐木工:美国动力锯和斧头使用相关伤害模式概述与比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 May;36(5):846-850. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.047. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Nonoccupational table saw-related injuries treated in US emergency departments, 1990-2007.1990 - 2007年美国急诊科治疗的与台锯相关的非职业性损伤
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1902-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b28ad3.
5
[Saw Injuries to the Hand - Epidemiological Aspects].[手部锯伤——流行病学方面]
Zentralbl Chir. 2017 Apr;142(2):194-198. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107435. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
6
The economic impact of electric saw injuries to the hand.电锯所致手部损伤的经济影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 May-Jun;34(5):886-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.002.
7
Trauma of the hand from circular saw table: a series of a 130 cases.圆锯台导致的手部创伤:130例系列病例
Tunis Med. 2016 Dec;94(12):851.
8
The Impact of Safety Regulations on the Incidence of Upper-Extremity Power Saw Injuries in the United States.安全法规对美国上肢电锯伤发生率的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Apr;42(4):296.e1-296.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.025.
9
Woodworking injuries: an epidemiologic survey of injuries sustained using woodworking machinery and hand tools.木工工伤:一项关于使用木工机械和手工工具所致损伤的流行病学调查。
J Hand Surg Am. 1987 Sep;12(5 Pt 2):890-5. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(87)80256-3.
10
Epidemiology of lawn-mower-related injuries to children in the United States, 1990-2004.1990 - 2004年美国儿童与割草机相关伤害的流行病学
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e273-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0056.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Upper Extremity Saw Injuries From 2003 to 2022.2003年至2022年上肢锯伤的趋势
Hand (N Y). 2024 Oct 29:15589447241292658. doi: 10.1177/15589447241292658.
2
Epidemiology of and Risk Factors for Table Saw Injuries of the Hands and Fingers.手部和手指台锯伤的流行病学及危险因素
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Feb 28;5(3):300-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.01.017. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Upper Extremity Wood Saw Injuries: Experience at a Single Level 1 Trauma Center.上肢木锯伤:单一级创伤中心的经验。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Nov;19(8):1277-1282. doi: 10.1177/15589447231174044. Epub 2023 May 24.
4
Prevalence of household meat grinder-induced severe hand injuries: A retrospective clinical study.家用绞肉机致严重手部损伤的发生率:一项回顾性临床研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Nov;28(11):1622-1626. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.55866.
5
A characterization of home maintenance equipment-related hand and lower arm injuries.家用维护设备相关手部和下臂损伤的特征描述。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jul 5;31:101943. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101943. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Epidemiology of complex hand injuries treated in the Plastic Surgery Department of a tertiary referral hospital in Warsaw.在华沙一家三级转诊医院的整形外科治疗的复杂手部损伤的流行病学。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct;47(5):1607-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01312-5. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
Weekend woodsmen: Overview and comparison of injury patterns associated with power saw and axe utilization in the United States.周末伐木工:美国动力锯和斧头使用相关伤害模式概述与比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 May;36(5):846-850. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.047. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Safety Regulations on the Incidence of Upper-Extremity Power Saw Injuries in the United States.安全法规对美国上肢电锯伤发生率的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Apr;42(4):296.e1-296.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.025.
2
Table saw injuries: epidemiology and a proposal for preventive measures.台锯伤:流行病学和预防措施建议。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):777e-783e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3bfb1.

台锯伤害:我们的安全装置真的能保障我们的安全吗?

Table Saw Injuries: Are Our Safety Features Really Keeping Us Safe?

作者信息

Smith Sarah E, Kendrick Ian, Huntsman Thomas

机构信息

1 Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, NY, USA.

2 Evanston Regional Hospital, WY, USA.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2018 Mar;13(2):181-183. doi: 10.1177/1558944717695754. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1177/1558944717695754
PMID:28719989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5950965/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, table saws sold in the United States have 3 safety features (riving knife, blade guard, and antikickback device) designed to prevent personal injury; however, these features can hinder the user's movements and are often disabled or removed. Despite the frequency of table saw injuries, there is relatively limited literature regarding them.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, observational study of characteristics associated with injuries incurred while using a table saw. Electronic medical records from Bassett Medical Center were reviewed from 2002 to 2014 to identify patients who sustained table saw injury, and surveys were sent to the patients. Tests of association between survey variables (eg, presence/absence of safety device vs severity of injury) were carried out using chi-square or Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Seventy-three percent of those injured had disabled their safety features or had no safety features present; 27% of those injured had one or more safety features enabled when they sustained the injury. Of those injured, 18% sustained a "mild" injury (skin laceration), 39% sustained a "moderate" injury (nerve or tendon injury), and 43% sustained a "severe" injury (partial or complete amputation). There was no statistically significant association between severity of the injury and presence/absence of safety features.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights 2 major problems with the current safety features: People are dissatisfied with current safety features, disabling them and sustaining injuries, and even when they are enabled, people are still getting injured-suggesting inadequacy of the current features.

摘要

背景

目前,在美国销售的台锯有三种安全装置(分料刀、锯片护罩和防反弹装置),旨在防止人身伤害;然而,这些装置会妨碍使用者的操作,因此常常被禁用或拆除。尽管台锯伤害事件频发,但相关文献相对较少。

方法

我们对使用台锯时受伤的相关特征进行了一项回顾性观察研究。回顾了2002年至2014年巴塞特医疗中心的电子病历,以确定遭受台锯伤害的患者,并向这些患者发送了调查问卷。使用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验对调查变量之间的关联进行了测试(例如,安全装置的有无与伤害严重程度)。

结果

73%的受伤者禁用了安全装置或根本没有安全装置;27%的受伤者在受伤时启用了一种或多种安全装置。在这些受伤者中,18%遭受“轻度”伤害(皮肤撕裂伤),39%遭受“中度”伤害(神经或肌腱损伤),43%遭受“重度”伤害(部分或完全截肢)。伤害严重程度与安全装置的有无之间没有统计学上的显著关联。

结论

本研究突出了当前安全装置的两个主要问题:人们对当前的安全装置不满意,禁用它们并因此受伤,而且即使启用了这些装置,人们仍然会受伤,这表明当前的装置存在不足。