Karpf Michael
M. Karpf is executive vice president for health affairs, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Acad Med. 2017 Sep;92(9):1225-1227. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001854.
In light of the ongoing debate about health care policy in the United States, including efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, it will be critically important for the academic community to engage in the dialogue. Developing a viable approach to health care reform requires an understanding of the interaction and interdependence between choice, cost, and coverage in a competitive and functional market-based system. Some institutions have implemented models that indicate the feasibility of providing high-quality, efficient patient care while working within fixed budgets. The academic community must stay engaged in these conversations because of its moral commitment to equitable access to health care for all. Academic medical centers will also have to define and protect their roles in an evolving health care delivery system in the United States.
鉴于美国正在进行的关于医疗保健政策的辩论,包括废除和取代《平价医疗法案》的努力,学术界参与对话将至关重要。制定可行的医疗保健改革方法需要理解在竞争和有效的基于市场的体系中选择、成本和覆盖范围之间的相互作用和相互依存关系。一些机构已经实施了相关模式,表明在固定预算内提供高质量、高效的患者护理是可行的。由于学术界在道德上致力于为所有人提供公平的医疗保健机会,因此必须持续参与这些对话。学术医疗中心还必须在美国不断发展的医疗保健服务体系中明确并保护自己的角色。