Li Z C, Su Y B, Bi X H, Wang Q Y, Wang J, Zhao J B, Liu L, Wang F L, Li D F, Lai C H
J Anim Sci. 2017 Jul;95(7):3103-3109. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1268.
The objective of this study was to compare the effect of source (corn DDGS, rice bran, or soybean) or form of oil (extracted or intact) on apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) and true total tract digestibility (TTTD) of acid-hydrolyzed ether extract (AEE) and fatty acids. The study determined and compared the ATTD or TTTD of AEE and fatty acids in extracted corn oil, rice oil, and soybean oil with intact oil in corn DDGS, full-fat rice bran, and full-fat soybean. Seventy-eight barrows (initial BW = 47.2 ± 3.9 kg; Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) were allotted to 1 of 13 dietary treatments in a randomized complete block design with 6 barrows in each dietary treatment. The 13 experimental diets included 1 cornstarch-soybean meal basal diet (AEE, 0.56%) and 3 diets containing 6% extracted oils (corn oil, rice oil, and soybean oil) and 9 diets supplemented with 3 levels of corn DDGS (17%, 34%, and 51%), full-fat rice bran (14%, 28%, and 42%), and full-fat soybean (12%, 24%, and 36%). These diets provided about 2%, 4%, and 6% intact oil, respectively. The barrows were housed in individual metabolism crates and were fed the assigned test diets at 4% of initial BW per day. A 5-d total collection of feces followed a 7-d diet adaptation period. The ATTD of AEE were calculated for each diet. The endogenous flow of AEE associated with each ingredient and values for TTTD were calculated using regression methods. The ATTD of AEE were greater ( < 0.05) for extracted oil than for intact oil. Compared to extracted oil, intact oil had lower ( < 0.01) ATTD of palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1), linoleic acid (C18:2), and linolenic acid (C18:3). However, a source by form interaction ( < 0.01) was observed for ATTD of C18:0, C18:2, and C18:3. The ATTD of C18:0, C18:2, and C18:3 in extracted corn and rice oil were greater compared with intact corn DDGS and rice oil ( < 0.05), while there was no significant difference for the ATTD of C18:0, C18:2, and C18:3 between extracted soybean oil and intact oil in full-fat soybean. In conclusion, lipids that are extracted have a greater digestibility compared with intact lipids, and this is especially true regarding saturated fatty acids. The ATTD of AEE in 2 forms of rice oil (intact oil and extracted oil) was less than the values in corn oil and soybean oil. The TTTD of AEE in corn DDGS and full-fat soybeans were greater than in full-fat rice bran.
本研究的目的是比较来源(玉米干酒糟、米糠或大豆)或油的形态(提取油或完整油)对酸水解乙醚提取物(AEE)和脂肪酸的表观全肠道消化率(ATTD)及真全肠道消化率(TTTD)的影响。该研究测定并比较了提取玉米油、米油和大豆油中AEE及脂肪酸的ATTD或TTTD与玉米干酒糟、全脂米糠和全脂大豆中完整油的情况。78头公猪(初始体重 = 47.2 ± 3.9千克;杜洛克×长白×约克夏)按随机完全区组设计分配到13种日粮处理中的一种,每个日粮处理有6头公猪。13种试验日粮包括1种玉米淀粉 - 豆粕基础日粮(AEE,0.56%)、3种含6%提取油(玉米油、米油和大豆油)的日粮以及9种补充3个水平玉米干酒糟(17%、34%和51%)、全脂米糠(14%、28%和42%)和全脂大豆(12%、24%和36%)的日粮。这些日粮分别提供约2%、4%和6%的完整油。公猪饲养在个体代谢笼中,按初始体重的4%每天饲喂指定的试验日粮。在7天的日粮适应期后进行为期5天的粪便全收集。计算每种日粮AEE的ATTD。使用回归方法计算与每种成分相关的AEE内源性流量及TTTD值。提取油的AEE的ATTD高于完整油(P < 0.05)。与提取油相比,完整油的棕榈酸(C16:0)、硬脂酸(C18:0)、油酸(C18:1)、亚油酸(C18:2)和亚麻酸(C18:3)的ATTD较低(P < 0.01)。然而,观察到C18:0、C18:2和C18:3的ATTD存在来源与形态的交互作用(P < 0.01)。提取玉米油和米油中C18:0、C18:2和C18:3的ATTD高于完整玉米干酒糟和米油(P < 0.05),而全脂大豆中提取大豆油和完整油之间C18:0、C18:2和C18:3的ATTD没有显著差异。总之,提取的脂质比完整脂质具有更高的消化率,饱和脂肪酸尤其如此。两种形态米油(完整油和提取油)中AEE的ATTD低于玉米油和大豆油中的值。玉米干酒糟和全脂大豆中AEE的TTTD高于全脂米糠中的。