Suppr超能文献

锁骨后入路与锁骨下入路在上肢臂丛神经阻滞麻醉中的比较:研究方案 随机对照试验

Retroclavicular approach vs infraclavicular approach for plexic bloc anesthesia of the upper limb: study protocol randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Langlois P L, Gil-Blanco A F, Jessop D, Sansoucy Y, D'Aragon F, Albert N, Echave P

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, J1H5N4, QC, Canada.

Department of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Laval (CHUL), Quebec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2086-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coracoid approach is recognized as the simplest approach to perform brachial plexus anaesthesia, but needle visualization needs to be improved. With a different needle entry point, the retroclavicular approach confers a perpendicular angle between the ultrasound and the needle, which theoretically enhances needle visualization. This trial compares these two techniques. The leading hypothesis is that the retroclavicular approach is comparable to the infraclavicular coracoid approach in general aspects, but needle visualization is better with this novel approach.

METHODS

We designed a multicentre, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Patients eligible for the study are older than 18 years, able to consent, will undergo urgent or elective upper limb surgery distal to the elbow and are classified with American Society of Anaesthesiologists risk score (ASA) I-III. They will be excluded if they meet contraindicated criteria to regional anaesthesia, have affected anatomy of the clavicle or are pregnant. Randomization will be done by a computer-generated randomization schedule stratified for each site and in 1:1 ratio, and concealment will be maintained with opaque, sealed envelopes in a locked office. The primary outcome, the performance time, will be analyzed using non-inferiority analysis while secondary outcomes will be analyzed with superiority analysis. Needle visualization will be ranked on a Likert scale of 1-5 that is subjective and represents a pitfall. Two separate persons will rank needle visualization to compensate this pitfall. According to previous studies, 49 patients per group are required for statistical power of 0.90 and one-sided type I error of 0.05.

DISCUSSION

The conduct of this study will bring clear answers to our questions and, if our hypothesis is confirmed, will confer an anatomic alternative to difficult coracoid infraclavicular brachial blocks or could even become a standard for brachial plexus anaesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02913625 . Registered on 12 September 2016.

摘要

背景

喙突入路被认为是实施臂丛神经麻醉最简单的入路,但针的可视化效果有待提高。采用不同的进针点,锁骨后入路可使超声与针之间呈垂直角度,理论上可增强针的可视化效果。本试验比较这两种技术。主要假设是,锁骨后入路在总体方面与锁骨下喙突入路相当,但这种新入路的针可视化效果更好。

方法

我们设计了一项多中心、随机、非劣效性试验。符合研究条件的患者年龄大于18岁,能够签署知情同意书,将接受肘部远端的急诊或择期上肢手术,且美国麻醉医师协会风险评分(ASA)为I - III级。若患者符合区域麻醉的禁忌标准、有锁骨解剖结构异常或怀孕,则将其排除。随机分组将通过计算机生成的随机分组方案进行,按每个研究地点分层,比例为1:1,并使用不透明密封信封在锁好的办公室中进行隐藏分组。主要结局指标为操作时间,将采用非劣效性分析,次要结局指标将采用优效性分析。针的可视化效果将采用1 - 5分的李克特量表进行主观评分,这是一个缺陷。将由两名独立人员对针的可视化效果进行评分以弥补这一缺陷。根据以往研究,每组需要49例患者才能达到0.90的统计效能和0.05的单侧I类错误率。

讨论

本研究的实施将为我们的问题带来明确答案,如果我们的假设得到证实,将为困难的锁骨下喙突臂丛阻滞提供一种解剖学替代方法,甚至可能成为臂丛神经麻醉标准。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02913625。于2016年9月12日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6466/5521069/13a514d83363/13063_2017_2086_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验