Suppr超能文献

门诊β-内酰胺单药治疗后社区获得性肺炎的非典型覆盖情况。

Atypical coverage in community-acquired pneumonia after outpatient beta-lactam monotherapy.

作者信息

van Werkhoven Cornelis H, van de Garde Ewoudt M W, Oosterheert Jan Jelrik, Postma Douwe F, Bonten Marc J M

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2017 Aug;129:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) after >48 h of outpatient beta-lactam monotherapy, coverage of atypical pathogens is recommended based on expert opinion.

METHODS

In a post-hoc analysis of a large study of CAP treatment we included patients who received beta-lactam monotherapy for >48 h before hospitalization. Length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, and number of treatment escalations were compared for those that continued beta-lactam monotherapy and those that received atypical coverage at admission.

RESULTS

Of 179 patients (median age 66 years (IQR 50-78), 100 (56%) male), 131 (73%) received additional atypical coverage at admission. These patients were younger, had less comorbidities, and longer symptom duration, compared to those that continued beta-lactam monotherapy. In crude analysis, median (IQR) LOS was 6 (4-8) and 6 (4-9) days, mortality was 2% and 4%, and treatment escalations occurred in 8 (17%) and 11 (8%) patients without and with atypical coverage, respectively. Adjusted effect ratios for absence of atypical coverage on LOS, mortality, and treatment escalation were 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.97), 0.37 (0.04-3.67), and 2.75 (0.94-8.09), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In adults hospitalized with CAP after >48 h of outpatient beta-lactam monotherapy, not starting antibiotics with atypical coverage was associated with a trend towards more treatment escalations, without evidence of increased LOS or mortality.

摘要

引言

对于门诊接受β-内酰胺单药治疗超过48小时后因社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院的成年人,根据专家意见建议覆盖非典型病原体。

方法

在一项CAP治疗大型研究的事后分析中,我们纳入了住院前接受β-内酰胺单药治疗超过48小时的患者。比较了继续使用β-内酰胺单药治疗的患者和入院时接受非典型病原体覆盖治疗的患者的住院时间(LOS)、30天死亡率和治疗升级次数。

结果

179例患者(中位年龄66岁(四分位间距50 - 78岁),100例(56%)为男性)中,131例(73%)入院时接受了额外的非典型病原体覆盖治疗。与继续使用β-内酰胺单药治疗的患者相比,这些患者更年轻,合并症更少,症状持续时间更长。在粗分析中,未接受和接受非典型病原体覆盖治疗的患者的中位(四分位间距)住院时间分别为6(4 - 8)天和6(4 - 9)天,死亡率分别为2%和4%,治疗升级分别发生在8例(17%)和11例(8%)患者中。未接受非典型病原体覆盖治疗对住院时间、死亡率和治疗升级的调整效应比分别为0.77(95%置信区间0.61 - 0.97)、0.37(0.04 - 3.67)和2.75(0.94 - 8.09)。

结论

对于门诊接受β-内酰胺单药治疗超过48小时后因CAP住院的成年人,未开始使用覆盖非典型病原体的抗生素与更多治疗升级趋势相关,但无住院时间延长或死亡率增加的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验