Mundschenk Minh-Bao, Odom Elizabeth B, Ghosh Trina D, Kleiber Grant M, Yee Andrew, Patel Kamlesh B, Mackinnon Susan E, Tenenbaum Marissa M, Buck Donald W
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
J Surg Educ. 2018 Mar-Apr;75(2):403-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
In surgical education, the areas of focus and evaluation are skewed toward technical skill and operative knowledge; less emphasized is familiarity with the patient's medical history. The purposes of this study were to characterize how surgical trainees prepare for cases and to determine the comprehensiveness of their preparation.
A 27-question survey was created through a web-based software program and distributed to all resident physicians and fellows in the Departments of Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Otolaryngology at our institution. Survey responses were collected anonymously and analyzed. Institutional review board exemption was obtained.
This study was performed at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, at an institutional hospital setting.
The survey was distributed to current surgical trainees at Washington University in St. Louis in the Departments of Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Otolaryngology. Further, 130 of 169 surgical residents and fellows completed the survey.
Most respondents (96%) taught themselves case preparation. Only 57% of respondents reviewed the patients medical record before every surgery. Although most respondents (83%) felt they were prepared or very prepared from a patient-specific standpoint, only 24% felt that their handoff of a patient to on-call colleagues was comprehensive enough to include all pertinent aspects of a patient's history and expected perioperative course. From a technical perspective, most residents (63%) felt they were prepared or very prepared, and this level of comfort increased with postgraduate year; 76% of respondents would not feel comfortable telling their attending they were not adequately prepared.
Although most trainees feel prepared or very prepared for cases from a patient-specific regard, only half review the patient's medical record before every surgery. Furthermore, almost all trainees have taught themselves how to prepare for surgery. This represents a critical gap in residency education and an opportunity to improve patient safety and quality of care.
在外科教育中,重点关注和评估的领域偏向技术技能和手术知识;对熟悉患者病史的重视程度较低。本研究的目的是描述外科实习生如何为病例做准备,并确定他们准备工作的全面性。
通过基于网络的软件程序创建了一份包含27个问题的调查问卷,并分发给我们机构外科、神经外科和耳鼻喉科的所有住院医师和研究员。调查回复以匿名方式收集并进行分析。获得了机构审查委员会的豁免。
本研究在密苏里州圣路易斯的华盛顿大学的一家机构医院进行。
该调查问卷分发给了圣路易斯华盛顿大学外科、神经外科和耳鼻喉科的现任外科实习生。此外,169名外科住院医师和研究员中有130人完成了调查。
大多数受访者(96%)自学病例准备。只有57%的受访者在每次手术前查看患者病历。尽管大多数受访者(83%)认为从患者特定角度来看他们已做好准备或准备得非常充分,但只有24%的人认为他们将患者交接给值班同事时足够全面,能涵盖患者病史和预期围手术期过程的所有相关方面。从技术角度来看,大多数住院医师(63%)认为他们已做好准备或准备得非常充分,并且这种自信程度随着研究生年级的增加而提高;76%的受访者表示如果告诉上级医师自己准备不充分会感到不自在。
尽管大多数实习生从患者特定角度觉得对病例已做好准备或准备得非常充分,但只有一半的人在每次手术前查看患者病历。此外,几乎所有实习生都是自学如何为手术做准备。这代表了住院医师教育中的一个关键差距,也是改善患者安全和护理质量的一个机会。